thoughts while looking at logwatch

[Itamar Heim]

On 02/25/2014 02:42 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> I think they may have passed unnoticed so let me resume here what I wrote in a previous email.
>
> 1) we should make it more clear on the website which version of Fedora are
> supported. We still have people trying to download oVirt 3.3 stable on Fedora 12, 15, 16 and 18.

brian --^

>
> 2) It seems that we should also start building epel7 packages:
> Fedora already started: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/repoview/
> And centos has a build: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-build-reports/2014-January/000000.html

+1 for .el7 builds.

>
> 3) Looking backward at Fedora 20 support missing, I think we should also start building on Fedora Rawhide
>

the problem is the minute it breaks (could be us, could be fedora), its 
broken till fixed, which may take a while, so further regressions can 
happen.
for example, fedora 20 comes with wildfly (aka jboss-as-8), which isn't 
something trivial to fix (without breaking jboss-as-7 support).

i wonder if we shouldn't skip f20 and aim for f21 by now...