thoughts while looking at logwatch

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 25/02/2014 13:59, Itamar Heim ha scritto:
> On 02/25/2014 02:42 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> I think they may have passed unnoticed so let me resume here what I wrote in a previous email.
>>
>> 1) we should make it more clear on the website which version of Fedora are
>> supported. We still have people trying to download oVirt 3.3 stable on Fedora 12, 15, 16 and 18.
> 
> brian --^
> 
>>
>> 2) It seems that we should also start building epel7 packages:
>> Fedora already started: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/repoview/
>> And centos has a build: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-build-reports/2014-January/000000.html
> 
> +1 for .el7 builds.
> 
>>
>> 3) Looking backward at Fedora 20 support missing, I think we should also start building on Fedora Rawhide
>>
> 
> the problem is the minute it breaks (could be us, could be fedora), its broken till fixed, which may take a while, so further regressions can happen.
> for example, fedora 20 comes with wildfly (aka jboss-as-8), which isn't something trivial to fix (without breaking jboss-as-7 support).

I'm not saying we should rely on having Rawhide working.
I'm saying that would be useful have a warning when it's not working so we can take a look and see if we're diverging from Rawhide.
Maybe we can sync with Fedora Virtualization SIG on this, they may help us as we help them discovering issues on Rawhide.

> 
> i wonder if we shouldn't skip f20 and aim for f21 by now...

+1 for Fedora 21 - oVirt 3.5.0 skipping f20 for < 3.5.0


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com