proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch

Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo at redhat.com
Thu Jan 16 15:59:42 UTC 2014


Il 16/01/2014 12:51, Itamar Heim ha scritto:
> On 01/16/2014 12:37 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
>>> To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "arch" <arch at ovirt.org>, "infra" <infra at ovirt.org>, "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:18:41 PM
>>> Subject: Re: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch
>>>
>>> El jue 16 ene 2014 11:15:52 CET, Sandro Bonazzola escribió:
>>>> Il 16/01/2014 11:12, Alon Bar-Lev ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: "infra" <infra at ovirt.org>, "arch" <arch at ovirt.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:09:46 PM
>>>>>> Subject: proposal for moving nightly to 3.4 stabilization branch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> since it seems not possible to have both master and 3.4 nightly builds, I
>>>>>> suggest to move nightly to 3.4 branches.
>>>>>> At this stage nobody really needs master nightly, while 3.4.0 branches
>>>>>> nightly will be more useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Kiril is working on splitting repo per version, so you have multiple
>>>>> nightly.
>>>>
>>>> nightly requires 6GB of disk space and we have just 3GB left there.
>>>> We're short on resources for having multiple nightlies right now.
>>>
>>> I correct myself, right now nightly takes ~3GB of space. I can try to
>>> make some space, but if the repo size increases a little we'll run out
>>> f space there.
>>
>> if nobody will test master then we will be in big problem when trying to stabilize it.
> 
> agree - we need master tested and we should have nightlies on it as well

We'll need more storage then...
Just to understand how much we need and if we can gather it, how many nightly has to be taken for allowing rollback?
just latest and previous?
Ignore rollback and just keep latest?


> 
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Sandro Bonazzola
>>>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>>>>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Arch mailing list
>>>>>> Arch at ovirt.org
>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> David Caro
>>>
>>> Red Hat S.L.
>>> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>>>
>>> Email: dcaro at redhat.com
>>> Web: www.redhat.com
>>> RHT Global #: 82-62605
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arch mailing list
>> Arch at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com



More information about the Infra mailing list