Bad setup code in vdsm_master_storage_functional_tests_localfs_gerrit
Vered Volansky
vered at redhat.com
Tue Jun 17 11:06:25 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> Cc: dcaro at redhat.com, "Vered Volansky" <vered at redhat.com>, "infra" <infra at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:33:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Bad setup code in vdsm_master_storage_functional_tests_localfs_gerrit
>
> On Tue 17 Jun 2014 10:24:49 AM CEST, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 03:40:51AM -0400, Vered Volansky wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> >>> To: "Vered Volansky" <vered at redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: "infra" <infra at ovirt.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 11:29:42 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: Bad setup code in
> >>> vdsm_master_storage_functional_tests_localfs_gerrit
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 04:11:53AM -0400, Vered Volansky wrote:
> >>>> The job with this issue is gone, let me know if it's risen again.
> >>>
> >>> The fragile code is still in
> >>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/All/job/vdsm_master_storage_functional_tests_localfs_gerrit/configure
> >>> why not make it more robust before /var/log/vdsm disappears and make it
> >>> break again?
> >>
> >> because I don't understand the issue. The file is only created if
> >> missing. The directory should be there.
>
> It was fixed by me some time ago (I added the mkdir -p before the
> touch, just in case)
>
> sudo mkdir -p /var/log/vdsm
> sudo chown vdsm:kvm
> sudo sh -c 'echo "" > /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log'
> sudo sh -c 'echo "" > /var/log/vdsm/supervdsm.log'
I saw that, but this thread was opened after this change.
>
> >
> > However, apparently it was not there, which made the echo fail, which
> > led to the job failing. We should understand why it disappeared.
> >
> > dcaro, eedri - do you have any idea?
>
> Totally agree, and, if it was meant to be there, I'll remove the mkdir
> to make the test fail if it's not there.
> But for what I see on the job, there's nothing that ensures you that
> the directory will be there, vdsm might never have been installed on
> that machine, or might have been properly cleaned at some point
> (removing logs and leftovers).
> So, In my opinion the issue is that we are not cleaning up properly
> after the vdsm jobs and leaving the logs behind.
We sure are not. In the past I had vdsm logs when vdsm was not installed, which led to this echo.
logrotate was suggested to me, but I saw the job is already configured this way and then told this was actually related to something else and the above is how it should be done.
A different suggestion is welcome.
The test is not supposed to run in parallel to another, this is how it's configured.
>
> Also, to which point can these tests run on docker? Anyone have tried?
No, When asked how to set it up this is what was suggested.
> Because it would make it fit to be run in parallel and on any slave
> with any specific deps.
>
>
> --
> David Caro
>
> Red Hat S.L.
> Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>
> Email: dcaro at redhat.com
> Web: www.redhat.com
> RHT Global #: 82-62605
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
More information about the Infra
mailing list