Jenkins Slaves
David Caro
dcaroest at redhat.com
Thu Apr 23 10:58:41 UTC 2015
Ok for me, now we have duplicated the ram of the servers we should be able to
create more slaves if needed too.
On 04/23, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> I would like to open a discussion on slaves allocation in jenkins.
>
> We currently have:
> CentOS 6: 5 slaves
> CentOS 7: 3 slaves
> Fedora 19: 2 slaves
> Fedora 20: 9 slaves
> Fedora 21: 7 slaves
>
> Total: 26 slaves
>
> For 3.5 we need:
> Fedora 20, CentOS 6, CentOS 7 + Fedora 21 for VDSM only
>
> For 3.6 we need:
> CentOS 6, CentOS 7, Fedora 22 + Fedora 21 for VDSM only
>
>
> I suggest to re-provision the 26 slaves as follow:
>
> CentOS 6: 7 slaves
> CentOS 7: 7 slaves
> Fedora 20: 3 slaves
> Fedora 21: 3 slaves
> Fedora 22: 6 slaves
>
> I didn't add the debian 7 slave in the count above, please reprovision it with Jessie next week (GA will be April 25)
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
--
David Caro
Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro at redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20150423/1d16ca0f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Infra
mailing list