stopping/aborting obsolete jenkins jobs
Eyal Edri
eedri at redhat.com
Tue May 5 07:19:57 UTC 2015
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eyal Edri" <eedri at redhat.com>
> To: "Yedidyah Bar David" <didi at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Infra" <infra at ovirt.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:15:21 AM
> Subject: Re: stopping/aborting obsolete jenkins jobs
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Yedidyah Bar David" <didi at redhat.com>
> > To: "Infra" <infra at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 8:26:43 AM
> > Subject: stopping/aborting obsolete jenkins jobs
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It happened to me quite a lot lately, that I pushed a new patchset for a
> > change,
> > before jenkins finished running relevant jobs for previous patchsets, in
> > some
> > cases
> > even before it started running some of them.
> >
> > Perhaps in such a case we should stop (if running) or disable/abort (if not
> > yet
> > running) all the jobs except for the ones running for the latest patchset?
>
> not sure its possible, but its not something that you want to do
> (aggressive interrupt jenkins running or queue)
>
> >
> > This will both give quicker results for the dev/maint and lower the load on
> > the
> > slaves.
> >
>
> we are working on improving this on 2 fronts:
> 1. adding more slaves
> 2. reducing job running time (findbugs is currently being optimized)
forgot one more thing - we added a new flag called 'workflow' which we are testing now on the jenkins project.
this flag means that the developer marks: "my code is ready for review" (might not be verified yet, since he wants early engagement before running a verification).
For jenkins it means that only when a developer will mark +1 on this patch
the jenkins jobs will start running on it (instead of running per patchset).
so if we're OK in adding this flag to engine/vdsm - it will reduce dramatically the amount of running jobs.
>
> and you're welcome to join the effort of getting there next monday, on the
> infra hackathon :) [1]
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PGGqI5tT_pmF7HUdg63FlozuVoQOBQaO-VID_R2eZqE/edit#gid=0
>
> > Best,
> > --
> > Didi
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infra mailing list
> > Infra at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
>
>
More information about the Infra
mailing list