Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #243

[Michal Skrivanek]

> On 12 Jul 2016, at 09:19, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Francesco Romani <fromani at redhat.com <mailto:fromani at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com <mailto:danken at redhat.com>>
> > To: "Nadav Goldin" <ngoldin at redhat.com <mailto:ngoldin at redhat.com>>, fromani at redhat.com <mailto:fromani at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Eyal Edri" <eedri at redhat.com <mailto:eedri at redhat.com>>, "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer at redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer at redhat.com>>, "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul at redhat.com <mailto:ykaul at redhat.com>>, "Martin
> > Perina" <mperina at redhat.com <mailto:mperina at redhat.com>>, "Tolik Litovsky" <tlitovsk at redhat.com <mailto:tlitovsk at redhat.com>>, "infra" <infra at ovirt.org <mailto:infra at ovirt.org>>
> > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 10:12:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #243
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:00:35PM +0300, Nadav Goldin wrote:
> > > Seems like [1], as ovirt-srv19  has fresh new FC24 installation,
> > > virtlogd is not enabled by default:
> > > ● virtlogd.service - Virtual machine log manager
> > >    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlogd.service; indirect;
> > > vendor preset: disabled)
> > >    Active: inactive (dead)
> > >      Docs: man:virtlogd(8)
> > >            http://libvirt.org <http://libvirt.org/>
> > > we can add it to puppet for now.
> > >
> > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357>
> >
> > Francesco, shouldn't vdsm require virtlogd explicitly?
> 
> Disclaimer: I didn't read yet the rest of the thread.
> 
> We choose not to, trying to prevent issues:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/55189/1 <https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/55189/1>
> Related-To: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318902 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318902>
> 
> I thought and still do it's quite a mistake - if we think a feature of our friends from libvirt is immature - we should tell them that, hopefully accompanied by bugs.

It’s not so much feature itself, rather it’s integration into OSes. I think there was enough feedback, a random google search shows a load of issues reported at the time this dependency was introduced, so I hope they learned from it

> I'd like to believe they don't enable features by default unless they believe the features are mature and ready for general consumption. If that's not the case, we should talk with them.

IMO it was a bit hasty on their part, and we just didn’t have time to resolve all the virtlogd daemon management in RHEL and RHEVH in time

Thanks,
michal


> Y.
> 
> 
> We want to reenable and require it in the near future:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321010 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321010>
> 
> HTH,
> 
> --
> Francesco Romani
> RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
> Phone: 8261328
> IRC: fromani
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20160712/92f422dc/attachment.html>