[JIRA] (OVIRT-1788) new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium

[Greg Sheremeta (oVirt JIRA)]

    [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35442#comment-35442 ] 

Greg Sheremeta commented on OVIRT-1788:
---------------------------------------

Ok, thanks. Why is a container better than simply doing a std-ci project similar to nodejs-dependencies? 

> new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OVIRT-1788
>                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788
>             Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OST
>            Reporter: Greg Sheremeta
>            Assignee: infra
>
> I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too.
> The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged.
> Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this.
> Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20171204/54e8e18b/attachment-0001.html>