[JIRA] (OVIRT-1500) CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit

[Allon Mureinik (oVirt JIRA)]

    [ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33139#comment-33139 ] 

Allon Mureinik commented on OVIRT-1500:
---------------------------------------

> So i'm not sure which inheritance are you reffering to, CI shouldn't run on patchset #2 since it was just commit msg update and returned +1 on the 1st patchset, no?

Eyal - the behavior of just marking patchset #1 with CI=+1 is correct.
I want this value **copied** to patchset #2, so it's visible from gerrit's dashboard. 
Otherwise, I need to see there's no CI score on the dashboard, go into this patch, read through the history to understand why it was never triggered on patchset #2 and mark CI=+1 myself (or manually trigger) in order to merge.

Nothing here is technically "wrong", but it's a poor UX for gerrit users, and we should strive to improve it if possible.

> CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OVIRT-1500
>                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500
>             Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Gerrit/git, oVirt CI
>            Reporter: Allon Mureinik
>            Assignee: infra
>
> In my recent engine patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78911 the CI passed, but was not marked as so in gerrit.
> Looking through gerrit's history, here's what I *think* is going on:
> 08:41 - patchset #1 is submitted
> 08:41 - CI (check-patch) starts for both EL7 and fc25
> _At this point I noticed a typo in the commit method. I fixed it and posted patchset #2_
> 08:42 - patchset #2 is submitted
> _CI was never triggered for patchset #2. Is this because the only difference between it and patchset #1 is the commit message?_ 
> 09:15 - CI for patchset #1 completes, and marks *patchset #1* with CI=+1. This is not inherited to patchset #2 for some reason.
> Expected behavior:
> If CI for patchset #1 passed and the only difference is the commit message (not the parent commit and not the content), I'd expect the CI score to be inherited.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1092.1#100053)