[JIRA] (OVIRT-1500) CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
Allon Mureinik (oVirt JIRA)
jira at ovirt-jira.atlassian.net
Mon Jul 3 08:52:41 UTC 2017
[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33139#comment-33139 ]
Allon Mureinik edited comment on OVIRT-1500 at 7/3/17 11:52 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}
So i'm not sure which inheritance are you reffering to, CI shouldn't run on patchset #2 since it was just commit msg update and returned +1 on the 1st patchset, no?
{quote}
Eyal - the behavior of just marking patchset #1 with CI=+1 is correct.
I want this value *copied* to patchset #2, so it's visible from gerrit's dashboard.
Otherwise, I need to see there's no CI score on the dashboard, go into this patch, read through the history to understand why it was never triggered on patchset #2 and mark CI=+1 myself (or manually trigger) in order to merge.
Nothing here is technically "wrong", but it's a poor UX for gerrit users, and we should strive to improve it if possible.
was (Author: mureinik):
> So i'm not sure which inheritance are you reffering to, CI shouldn't run on patchset #2 since it was just commit msg update and returned +1 on the 1st patchset, no?
Eyal - the behavior of just marking patchset #1 with CI=+1 is correct.
I want this value **copied** to patchset #2, so it's visible from gerrit's dashboard.
Otherwise, I need to see there's no CI score on the dashboard, go into this patch, read through the history to understand why it was never triggered on patchset #2 and mark CI=+1 myself (or manually trigger) in order to merge.
Nothing here is technically "wrong", but it's a poor UX for gerrit users, and we should strive to improve it if possible.
> CI on ovirt-engine patch succeeded, but didn't mark CI=+1 on gerrit
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OVIRT-1500
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1500
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Gerrit/git, oVirt CI
> Reporter: Allon Mureinik
> Assignee: infra
>
> In my recent engine patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78911 the CI passed, but was not marked as so in gerrit.
> Looking through gerrit's history, here's what I *think* is going on:
> 08:41 - patchset #1 is submitted
> 08:41 - CI (check-patch) starts for both EL7 and fc25
> _At this point I noticed a typo in the commit method. I fixed it and posted patchset #2_
> 08:42 - patchset #2 is submitted
> _CI was never triggered for patchset #2. Is this because the only difference between it and patchset #1 is the commit message?_
> 09:15 - CI for patchset #1 completes, and marks *patchset #1* with CI=+1. This is not inherited to patchset #2 for some reason.
> Expected behavior:
> If CI for patchset #1 passed and the only difference is the commit message (not the parent commit and not the content), I'd expect the CI score to be inherited.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1092.1#100053)
More information about the Infra
mailing list