vdsm ppc64le support

[Eyal Edri]

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 25 June 2017 at 09:38, Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> בתאריך 23 ביוני 2017 15:56,‏ "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
>>>> כתב:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> we dropped publishing vdsm ppc64le builds on snapshot repos due to
>>>> issues keeping aligned nvr between x86_64 and ppc64le.
>>>>
>>>> Today we're still missing ppc64le builds on
>>>> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/
>>>>
>>>> Where do we stand with the support for the build of the same nvr ob
>>>> both arches?
>>>>
>>>> Can we get it re-enabled?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. We solved the issues we had with this a while ago with the new
>>>> deploy-to-expetimental job. Are you sure the ppc64le builds are not making
>>>> it to 'tested'? (Im assuming the builds themselves are enabled...)
>>>>
>>>> I suppose the situation with 4.1 is a little different because it is
>>>> not taking stuff from 'tested' yet...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sent [1], which should solve it.
>>> Barak, the fact that we still publish nightly to 4.1 in the old way can
>>> somehow still cause issues for publishing both ppc64le and x86_64?
>>> The only thing I can think of is if for a very slim chance, one of the
>>> builds of vdsm is running during the time publisher works resulting in a
>>> mismatch in the repo, right?
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah, not very probable.
>>
>> Maybe we should just clean up the publishers and move 4.1 to use 'tested'
>> too. Do we have a ticket about that?
>>
>
> https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1477
>
> But I don't see a good reason to push it forward unless we hit a problem
> or blocker, it might cause issues like we've seen in master and also
> there is a good chance 4.1 still has old non-standard CI projects that
> will make it impossible to finish, unless we migrate them to standard CI
> (which also might not be worth the effort).
>
> Bottom line, good to have a ticket on it, we'll do if we see its needed at
> some point.
>


Verified we have ppc64le on 4.1-snapshot:

http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/ppc64le/


BTW, we're still building and publishing qemu-kvm-rhev to 4.1, i'm assuming
the latest change to pick it up from kvm-common was for master only?



>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Barak Korren
>> RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
>> Red Hat EMEA
>> redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Eyal edri
>
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER
>
> RHV DevOps
>
> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>



-- 

Eyal edri


ASSOCIATE MANAGER

RHV DevOps

EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D


Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018>
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20170625/f51b7cdf/attachment-0001.html>