[Users] high availability via fencing
Ian Levesque
ian at crystal.harvard.edu
Thu Apr 26 15:18:15 UTC 2012
On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Ian Levesque wrote:
>>> So, what I see is that port was sent twice , once as empty and then the port=22 is sent as part of the options string.
>>>
>>> Can you please remove the port from the options field and put it in the port field.
>>> If this works , this is an engine core bug...
>>
>> I believe that it is such a bug, since the "options" field come up as
>> empty in vdsm.
>
> I tried entering a Port, Slot and "plug=1" in options. I also checked "Secure". It indeed appears that the engine isn't passing the options along. I also find it odd that a required field (plug) isn't available via a form field. Is that just a side effect? I can file a bug -- does it belong in ovirt-engine-core?
Bug submitted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816640
~irl
More information about the Users
mailing list