[Users] [Engine-devel] New oVirt-engine RPMs available - Release Candidates

[Ofer Schreiber]

On 01/30/2012 05:10 AM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ofer Schreiber"<oschreib at redhat.com>
>> To: users at ovirt.org, engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:25:44 AM
>> Subject: [Engine-devel] New oVirt-engine RPMs available - Release Candidates
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've just finished uploading a new set of oVirt-engine rpms into
>> ovirt.org.
>>
>> These rpms, versioned 3.0.0_0001-1.4, are considered as release
>> candidates for our first release.
>>
>> In order to install the RPMs, please follow the instructions
>> described in
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Installing_ovirt_from_rpm
>>
>> Feedback, comments and bug reports are always welcome.
> I'm still working through testing and will file some bugs when I've gotten through some downstream stuff but here's a few issues :
>
> 1) engine-setup
>
> After the setup I get the following warning
>
> " * There is less than 4 GB available free memory on the Host.
> It is  recommended to have at least 4 GB available memory to run the RHEV Manager."
>
> 4GB is what we're using for RHEV but with the reduced overhead of AS7 -vs- EAP5 is that still the right number
>
> But we obviously need to change the "RHEV Manager" reference.

Text issue already fixed in main branch.
About the memory concerns, you're right, we should redefine the memory 
requirements.

>
> 2) engine-config
>
> There's a number of text labels that need to be fixed eg.
> oVirtISOsRepositoryPath: "The RHEV-H installation files path" (Value Type: String)
>
> Also we need to fix some of the longer names eg.
> VdcVersion: "oVirt Enterprise Virtualization Engine Manager Version" (Value Type: String)
>
> 3) webadmin
> Logo in WebAdmin is Red Hat Shadowman, that needs to be updated.
> We can't go out with "Browser not supported" messages like this. The browsers installed on f16 - our target platform can't give this error message.
>
>
> 4) VDS Bootstrap
>
> If you check the  box for iptables then it breaks the system with an invalid rule
>
> Looking at the error from my system
> "Jan 29 21:38:50 host1 iptables.init[1637]: iptables: Applying firewall rules: iptables-restore v1.4.12: physdev: option "--physdev-is-bridged" cannot be inverted."
>
> The problem is that we are using
> "-A FORWARD -m physdev ! --physdev-is-bridged -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited"
>
> -vs-
>
> "-I FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-is-bridged -j ACCEPT"
>
>
> On the point of iptables, why do we open libvirt tls port and the snmp port.
>
>
> After I fixed iptables I still had a problem, the host was showing as non-operational with the error message "NETWORK_UNREACHABLE" (there's a literal missing there)
>
> Looking at the host it appears that the management bridge wasn't created.
>
> The bootstrap log is attached. It shows the operation failing but still marked the bootstrap as successful.
> (also in the log we have rhn/satellite references that need to be removed)
>
> I've not looked at the reason for the failure yet, but an empty line at the end of my ifcfg-em1 file looks suspicious.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> The oVirt-Engine team
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>