[Users] Regarding ovirt node iso

[aru mon]

Thanks Mike. Its clear now. :-)

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Mike Burns <mburns at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 15:33 +0530, aru mon wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I am trying to understand the difference of the different installation
> > package available for ovirt node.
> >
> > 1. ovirt-node-image-2.2.3-1.1.fc16.iso
>
> This is the actual iso that you want to install
>
> > 2. ovirt-node-image-latest.iso
>
> This is a sym link to #1, so will work too
>
> > 3. ovirt-node-2.2.2.tar
>
> This is the source tarball for the ovirt-node rpm (not the iso).  You
> would need to take this, then build the rpm from it, then generate the
> iso from it in order to generate the ovirt-node-image.iso
>
>
> As a separate note, I just uploaded ovirt-node-iso-latest.iso and
> ovirt-node-iso-2.3.0-0.20120323030125gitccefc56.28.fc16.iso to the
> releases/nightly/binary directory.  These are the latest versions of the
> ovirt-node iso image.  We did have a name change to ovirt-node-iso from
> ovirt-node-image.  This is a preview of the 2.3.0 release we hope to
> ship next week.
>
> Mike
>
> >
> > Please help me to understand the difference of the above three files.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Arumon
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120323/9bf5ffb3/attachment-0001.html>