[Users] Increase storage domain
Alan Johnson
alan at datdec.com
Thu Sep 27 10:26:44 EDT 2012
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Ayal Baron <abaron at redhat.com> wrote:
> Sounds really over-complicated for what you're trying to do.
>
Agreed! That's why I asked. =) To be clear, all that was necessary to end
up where I wanted was to reboot the hosts, which is not terribly
complicated, but time consuming and should not be necessary. I tired all
those other steps based on recommendations in this thread to avoid the
reboot.
> After increasing the size of the LUN in the storage side try running the
> following command on the SPM:
> vdsClient -s 0 getDeviceList
> (-s is only if ssl is enabled, otherwise just remove it)
>
> After that run pvresize (for LVM to update its metadata).
> That should be it on the SPM side.
>
This did not make any difference. I increased the LUN to 14.1 on the
Equallogics box and then ran these commands (you may want to skip past this
to the text below since I am leaning heavily toward the add a LUN method):
[root at cloudhost04 ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/mapper/364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027
VG Name 64c4a870-98dc-40fc-b21e-092156febcdc
PV Size 14.00 TiB / not usable 129.00 MiB
Allocatable yes
PE Size 128.00 MiB
Total PE 114686
Free PE 111983
Allocated PE 2703
PV UUID h8tZon-o5sB-FR4M-m8oT-UPub-eM1w-7eexhO
[root at cloudhost04 ~]# vdsClient -s 0 getDeviceList
[{'GUID': '364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027',
'capacity': '15393163837440',
'devtype': 'iSCSI',
'fwrev': '5.2',
'logicalblocksize': '512',
'partitioned': False,
'pathlist': [{'connection': '10.10.5.18',
'initiatorname': 'default',
'iqn':
'iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:4-52aed6-685d3fd83-2700022942e505b7-cloud2',
'port': '3260',
'portal': '1'}],
'pathstatus': [{'lun': '0',
'physdev': 'sdd',
'state': 'active',
'type': 'iSCSI'}],
'physicalblocksize': '512',
'productID': '100E-00',
'pvUUID': 'h8tZon-o5sB-FR4M-m8oT-UPub-eM1w-7eexhO',
'serial': '',
'vendorID': 'EQLOGIC',
'vgUUID': 'XtdGHH-5WwC-oWRa-bv0V-me7t-T6ti-M9WKd2'}]
[root at cloudhost04 ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/mapper/364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027
VG Name 64c4a870-98dc-40fc-b21e-092156febcdc
PV Size 14.00 TiB / not usable 129.00 MiB
Allocatable yes
PE Size 128.00 MiB
Total PE 114686
Free PE 111983
Allocated PE 2703
PV UUID h8tZon-o5sB-FR4M-m8oT-UPub-eM1w-7eexhO
[root at cloudhost04 ~]# pvresize /dev/mapper/364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027
Physical volume "/dev/mapper/364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027" changed
1 physical volume(s) resized / 0 physical volume(s) not resized
[root at cloudhost04 ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/mapper/364ed2a35d83f5d68b705e54229020027
VG Name 64c4a870-98dc-40fc-b21e-092156febcdc
PV Size 14.00 TiB / not usable 129.00 MiB
Allocatable yes
PE Size 128.00 MiB
Total PE 114686
Free PE 111983
Allocated PE 2703
PV UUID h8tZon-o5sB-FR4M-m8oT-UPub-eM1w-7eexhO
So, not change.
> Then if indeed it succeeds, wait a little while for engine to catch up (it
> periodically runs getStoragePoolInfo and updates its info about free space,
> you can find this in vdsm.log)
> regardless, see below for the preferred method.
>
Thanks for the confirmation. Any idea what the interval is?
> Alternately, would it just be better to create a new LUN on the iSCSI
> > target and add it to the storage domain? Is that even doable?
>
> This flow is fully supported and is currently the easiest way of doing
> this (supported from the GUI and from the CLI). Simply extend a domain with
> a new LUN
>
Great! I'll give that a shot.
>
> > Certainly it is as simple as adding a new PV to the VG in LVM, but
> > does the engine/GUI support it? It seems a bit more messy than
> > growing an existing domain from an iSCSI target point of view, but
> > are there any technical down sides?
>
> The target has nothing to do with it, you can have multiple LUNs behind
> the same target.
The target serves the LUNs and it was the additional LUNs that I
was referring to as being messier when a single LUN could do the job. Not
a big problem, just name the LUNs the same the same patters (cloud<#> in my
case), but when all other things are equal, less LUNs is less to think
about.
However, as I read this email, it occurred that some other things might not
be equal. Specifically, using multiple LUNs could provide a means of
shrinking the storage domain in the future. LVM provides a simple means to
remove a PV from a VG, but does the engine support this in the CLI or GUI?
That is, if the a storage domain has multiple LUNs in it, can those be
removed at a later date?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120927/d0555022/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list