[Users] [Spice-devel] 3.2 final and status of spice console in ie

Juan Jose jj197005 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 12 12:25:33 UTC 2013


Hello Karli,

You are wellcome, yes, at the moment we are testing but our idea is to
connect engine to a user validation system. I will try to do it using
Samba4 system and all needed pieces.

Thanks,

Juanjo.


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/12/2013 11:27 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>
>> Hey Everyone!
>>
>> I solved it! I friggin solved it, and it didn´t have anything to do with
>> the spice-client, spice-plugin(ActiveX or XPI), or userportal
>> specifically, it´s in the engine itself! So Juanjo here said that it
>> works for him, and I took a guess that´s because he is only using
>> admin at internal <mailto:admin at internal> for testing (correct me if I´m
>>
>> wrong Juanjo), so I added a "UserRole" to admin on a test VM, logged
>> into Userportal, clicked for console, and it worked! So, since our setup
>> is a little more complex, as it´s connected to our ActiveDirectory, I
>> concluded that it must be a permissions related issue. I created a new
>> UserRole, called "ConsoleOwner" that only have "Login Permissions" and
>> "RemoteLogin" and added that role to our engine´s "System Permissions"
>> on a directory group as "broad" as possible. After that if I also added
>> an explicit UserRole permission for a directory user on any VM now it
>> works 100%. Me so happy!:)
>>
>> A question goes out the developers: Should you have to do that? I
>> thought that permissions where supposed to be calculated like Windows
>> ACLs "Effective Permissions", so that if I just add sufficient
>> permissions for a directory user on a VM, it´s effective permissions
>> should have granted the necessary abilities in the system, without me
>> having to first add that as a "big" system permission to have them
>> granted? Bug, or intended?
>>
>> Thank you so much Juanjo, for posting the versions you are currently
>> using that proved that it "should" work, and that it had to be something
>> else that prevented us from using it (which it was). Thank you!
>>
>
> can you please clarify again which permission you granted to a user on the
> VM which didn't work before you added to the user the console permission?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130412/ebcfdd50/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list