[Users] save to restart libvirtd ?

[Alex Leonhardt]

Thanks Martin,

I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all 
went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after 
restarting libvirtd :) ..

I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could 
have grown this big :\

Thanks
Alex


On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
>> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
>>
> Hi,
>
> for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users at redhat.com, but for
> this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
> enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
> being ran.
>
> Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
> single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
> your machines.
>
> Have a nice day,
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130415/64de4d86/attachment-0001.html>