[Users] save to restart libvirtd ?
Martin Kletzander
mkletzan at redhat.com
Tue Apr 16 08:18:08 UTC 2013
On 04/16/2013 12:21 AM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
> Thanks Martin,
>
> I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all
> went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after
> restarting libvirtd :) ..
>
> I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could
> have grown this big :\
>
There might be some memleaks, especially in older version. For this
kind of stuff, I'd maybe use the libvir-list [1]
Martin
[1] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
> Thanks
> Alex
>
>
> On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
>>> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users at redhat.com, but for
>> this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
>> enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
>> being ran.
>>
>> Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
>> single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
>> your machines.
>>
>> Have a nice day,
>> Martin
>
More information about the Users
mailing list