[Users] save to restart libvirtd ?

[Alex Leonhardt]

would that stop any of the running VMs ?

alex

On 04/16/2013 09:47 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:12:35PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart
>>> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users at redhat.com, but for
>> this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that
>> enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are
>> being ran.
>>
>> Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every
>> single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of
>> your machines.
> Indeed. Vdsm should notice that libvirtd has died, and restart itself.
> However, it would be safer to stop Vdsm explicitly before you do that
> (for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/8283 )
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130416/5f1f52dd/attachment-0001.html>