[Users] simple networking? [SOLVED] mostly

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Mon Dec 16 07:27:19 UTC 2013


On 12/13/2013 06:04 AM, Ted Miller wrote:
>
> ________________________________________
> From: users-bounces at ovirt.org <users-bounces at ovirt.org> on behalf of Ted Miller <tmiller at hcjb.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:18 PM
> To: users at ovirt.org
> Subject: [Users] simple networking?
>
> I am trying to set up a testing network using o-virt, but the networking is
> refusing to cooperate.  I am testing for possible use in two different
> production setups.
>
> My previous experience has been with VMWare.  I have always set up a single
> bridged network on each host.  All my hosts, VMs, and non-VM computers were
> peers on the LAN.  They could all talk to each other, and things worked very
> well.  There was a firewall/gateway that provided access to the Internet, and
> hosts, VMs, and could all communicate with the Internet as needed.
>
> o-virt seems to be compartmentalizing things beyond all reason.
> Is there any way to set up simple networking, so ALL computers can see each
> other?
> Is there anywhere that describes the philosophy behind the networking setup?
> What reason is there that networks are so divided?
>
> After banging my head against the wall trying to configure just one host, I
> am very frustrated.  I have spent several HOURS Googling for a coherent
> explanation of how/why networking is supposed to work, but only fine obscure
> references like "letting non-VMs see VM traffic would be a huge security
> violation".  I have no concept of what king of an installation the o-virt
> designers have in mind, but it is obviously worlds different from what I am
> trying to do.
>
> The best I can tell, o-virt networking works like this (at least when you
> have only one NIC):
> there must be an ovirtmgt network, which cannot be combined with any other
> network.
>        the ovirtmgt network cannot talk to VMs (unless that VM is running the
> engine)
>        the ovirtmgt network can only talk to hosts, not to other non-VM computers
> a VM network can talk only to VMs
>        cannot talk to hosts
>        cannot talk to non-VMs
> hosts cannot talk to my LAN
> hosts cannot talk to VMs
> VMs cannot talk to my LAN
> All of the above are enforced by a boatload of firewall rules that o-virt
> puts into every host and VM under its jurisdiction.
>
> All of the above is inferred from things I Googled, because I can't find
> anywhere that explains what or how things are supposed to work--only things
> telling people WHAT THEY CANT DO.  All I see on the mailing lists is people
> getting their hands slapped because they are trying to do SIMPLE SETUPS that
> should work, but don't (due to either design restrictions or software bugs).
>
> My use case A:
>    * My (2 or 3) hosts have only one physical NIC.
>    * My VMs exist to provide services to non-VM computers.
>       *  The VMs do not run X-windows, but they provide GUI programs to
> non-VMs via "ssh -X" connections.
>    * MY VMs need access to storage that is shared with hosts and non-VMs on
> the LAN.
>
> Is there some way to TURN OFF network control in o-virt?  My systems are
> small and static.  I can hand-configure the networking a whole lot easier
> than I can deal with o-virt (as I have used it so far). Mostly I would need
> to be able to turn off the firewall rules on both hosts and VMs.
>
> banging head against wall,
> Ted
> *********************************************************
>
> I have spent the last three days getting a Centos 6.5 host running under O-virt.
>
> Since the networking was just a small part of this, I am going to open an new thread
> to discuss the Centos 6.5 host setup process.  Look for a thread titled something like
> "Centos 6.5 host configuration" if you want the gory details, or want to try if for yourself.
>
> My biggest problem is that the o-virt GUI is apparently incapable of setting
> up a bridge in Centos, which turned out to be what I needed.  I had to set up the
> bridge BEFORE adding the host to the ovirt cluster.  If the bridge was not set
> up ahead of time, the whole installation failed completely.

you shouldn't have to do *anything* from the host. the gui/engine should 
take care of everything. can you reproduce this from the engine on 
another host and document the steps for further investigation?

thanks,
    Itamar

>
> The bridge was only one of a list of things that had to be done ahead of time, in order
> for the process to complete correctly.
>
> Ted Miller
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>




More information about the Users mailing list