[Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

[Jiri Belka]

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:29:58 -0500
Dave Allan <dallan at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they
> > > don't use libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux
> > > specifics).
> 
> I'm kind of surprised to hear you say that.  One of libvirt's goals is
> portability, so if it doesn't work on Solaris now, you should mention
> it on libvir-list, and I wouldn't expect getting it to work would be
> that troublesome.  Personally I don't use Solaris, but if it's
> something you want, you should ask and see what other people's
> experience is.

OK, I thought it just client is portable, I will need to read
more ;)

jbelka