[Users] host deploy and after reboot not responsive

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:16:09AM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>, "Adam Litke" <agl at us.ibm.com>, "users" <users at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:09:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Users] host deploy and after reboot not responsive
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:57:03AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg  wrote:
> > > > Gianluca, how about softening our ntpd requirement with something
> > > > like
> > > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11291 ?
> > > >
> > > > Could you verify that it's working on your system?
> > > 
> > > Yes, I can test the change the service modification for vdsmd.
> > > I presume you want me to test it with default fedora 18, so chronyd
> > > enabled and ntpd disabled, correct?
> > 
> > Yes. though my patch may generate excessive noise, with its attempt
> > to
> > start two conflicting service. I suppose that we can/should "want"
> > only
> > chrony. But please provide your input.
> 
> We should use either, and default.

I'm not sure that I parse your English properly. Could you be more
explict, preferably in a code review of
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11291/ ?

> On none systemd other distributions there is the concept of 'provides'.
> This means that a service like vdsmd can depend on timesync and a service like chronyd *AND* ntpd provide timesync.
> This is kind of logical name for service.
> Also other non systemd distributions provides the ability to script the dependencies.
> 
> I could not find either of he above methods in systemd documentation.