[Users] HA and SPM host

[Itamar Heim]

On 06/13/2013 08:14 PM, Marc Seward wrote:
> Would it be correct to say that VMs running on NFS/local storage will
> not be affected if there is no SPM host.In other words,these VMs can
> still be started on a non SPM host (host 2) after host1 got fenced(SPM
> host before it got fenced).

yes, except for operations like live snapshot or storage live migration

>
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013, Marc Seward wrote:
>
>
>
>     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     From: *Marc Seward* <linuxuser26 at gmail.com <javascript:_e({},
>     'cvml', 'linuxuser26 at gmail.com');>>
>     Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM
>     Subject: Re: [Users] HA and SPM host
>     To: Jiri Belka <jbelka at redhat.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>     'jbelka at redhat.com');>>
>
>
>     Thank you very much for your response.
>
>     I have noticed delays in the selection of the SPM host and attempts
>     to run VMs even before SPM host is selected.AFAIU,that is incorrect
>     behavior.
>
>
>     On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Jiri Belka <jbelka at redhat.com
>     <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jbelka at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>
>         On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:16:28 -0400
>         Marc Seward <linuxuser26 at gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>         'linuxuser26 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>          > Hi all,
>          >
>          > In a 2 hypervisor setup,if host1 is fenced(host1 is also the
>         SPM host) and
>          > it has HA VMs running on it,would these VMs be started on
>         host2 only after
>          > host2 is elected as the SPM host?
>
>         It would first try to migrate VMs and if this won't work if
>         would fence
>         SPM host and start HA VMs on other (now new SPM) host.
>
>         j.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>