[Users] Fedora upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2

Alfred Angelov alfred at space2u.com
Sun Jun 23 19:08:27 UTC 2013


Hey,

This might sounds like a foolish question, but from the link you mentioned:

> oVirt 3.1 was released as Fedora 17 package while 3.2 is targeted 
> Fedora 18. Due to the nature of this upgrade, we DO NOT recommend it, 
> users are advised to do a 3.2 clean installation, and to import all 
> VM's and template into the new installation. 

Is there anything special I would have to do to import all the VMs 
(around 40) from my ovirt 3.1.0-2 to another ovirt (which runs 3.2.2) ?

Mvh, Alfred Angelov

On 06/23/2013 11:35 AM, Alex Lourie wrote:
> Hi Karli
>
> I've written up all we know at [1], please try to follow it (if you 
> haven't yet) and let us know how it goes. If anything goes wrong, we 
> will look for the ways to resolve it.
>
> Alex.
>
> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.1_to_3.2_upgrade
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Alex Lourie <alourie at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Karli
>>
>> I am reviewing all the actions again, and hopefully will have 
>> something documented on Sunday.
>>
>> Alex.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Karli Sjöberg 
>> <Karli.Sjoberg at slu.se> wrote:
>> > tis 2013-06-18 klockan 10:06 +0300 skrev Moran Goldboim: On > 
>> 06/17/2013 02:51 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>> >> >> >  mån 2013-06-17 klockan 10:11 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie: On 
>> Fri, > Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Karli Sjöberg <Karli.Sjoberg at slu.se> 
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi!
>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Hi Karli,
>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > More than two months have passed without any 
>> notices or updates >>>> on >>>> > this issue, and looking at the 
>> bugreport absolutely nothing has >>>> been >>>> > done since then. 
>> What´s confusing me is that the release >>>> management >>>> > for 
>> oVirt 3.2 has this clearly printed:
>> >>>> > "MUST: Upgrade from previous release"
>> >>>> > >>>> > And you all seem too busy with getting the next release 
>> out of >>>> the >>>> > door before fixing the current... What gives? 
>> Don´t you care >>>> about >>>> > early adopters?
>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I apologise that this issue wasn't taken care of 
>> yet. It is clear >>>> that >>>> the priorities of developers shifted 
>> towards work on features in >>>> 3.3 >>>> release, which feature 
>> freeze is happening in about 2 weeks, so >>>> you can >>>> understand 
>> the time pressure they all have. There's no need to be >>>> angry 
>> >>>> about that. It is an open source project and as resources for 
>> the >>>> development are limited, we're trying to do our best to 
>> cover as >>>> much >>>> issues as possible. This can lead to 
>> situations as this issue, >>>> which >>>> may be left behind for some 
>> time.
>> >>>> >>>  >>> I´m not angry, as I stated before, I´m more confused, 
>> and maybe a >>> little disappointed that important(in my opinion) 
>> pieces of a >>> projects continuum have been ignored like that. I´m 
>> having a hard >>> time understanding the reasoning behind the 
>> priorities that have >>> made this issue appear. In my mind, making 
>> sure that users of any >>> project are able to follow between minor 
>> upgrades is a given, with >>> a schedule like; 1) Feature freeze, 2) 
>> Fix release blockers >>> (upgrading being one of them), 3) Release, 
>> in that order. Now >>> what´s happening is that you are kind of 
>> hoping to drag this out >>> until the problem goes away by itself 
>> when you decide it´s time to >>> stop supporting 3.1.
>> >>> >>>> That said, the process for upgrading the oVirt 3.1 on Fedora 
>> 17 to >>>> oVirt 3.2 on Fedora 18 is complex and non-trivial, that's 
>> why it >>>> is >>>> taking time to resolve all the issues that come 
>> up in the process.
>> >>>> >>>> If this matter is not extremely urgent, we are currently 
>> working >>>> on a >>>> tool that may make this upgrade easier, 
>> albeit, maybe, not >>>> completely >>>> automatic.
>> >>>> >>>> On the other hand, if this is a completely and utterly 
>> urgent, we >>>> may >>>> try to guide you through possible manual 
>> attempts to perform the >>>> upgrade. Mind though, that they weren't 
>> thoroughly tested, and not >>>> promised to go smoothly or even work, 
>> and we may have to think >>>> about >>>> possible alternative 
>> solutions on the go.
>> >>>> >>>  >>> Straight answer: Am I ever going to be able to upgrade 
>> from 3.1 to >>> 3.2?
>> >>> >>> My concern (fear) is about being left behind, abandoned. It 
>> makes >>> me feel non-important. Just like any admin, the work put 
>> down to >>> make Templates, to set up quotas, create VMPools, a dozen 
>> of >>> guests. And then have to export everything (nullifying the 
>> idea of >>> "Thin Provisioning"), redo every Role, reset every 
>> permission, >>> quota, and so on, isn´t (in my opinion) viable in the 
>> long run for >>> oVirt as a project to demand. That´s why I had the 
>> notion that >>> upgrading surely had to be a high priority. Was I 
>> wrong about that?
>> >>> >>  >> upgrade actually was high priority task, but due to lots 
>> of platform >> (fedora 18) changes, it became a huge operation to 
>> support it (which >> comes on top new features/bugs/support etc.).
>> >> in addition we have noticed that the interest from the community 
>> >> regarding it, is very limited.
>> >> >> from where i see i we have couple of options:
>> >> -if there is enough interest from the community we can give it >> 
>> another go (though i think most of it moved long ago to oVirt 3.2)
>> >> >  > You certainly have my interest at least;)
>> > >> -we can help individuals by making a migration (3.1->3.2) 
>> document >> on fedora base systems- we'll probably need your 
>> assistance on >> testing side here
>> >> >  > A document explaining how to upgrade would be completly 
>> acceptable > for me. I´m not asking for a turnkey command that makes 
>> everything > for me, I´ve managed to get quite far by myself any way. 
>> I would > love to help testing the procedure, as I´ve stated before, 
>> we have > set up a dedicated test environment dedicated for this 
>> specific > upgrade task in mind, with engine, hosts and storage 
>> somewhat equal > to the production system. Please, if there´s 
>> anything I can do to > help, don´t hesitate to ask!
>> > >> >> >>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>> Alex Lourie,
>> >>>> Software Developer in Integration,
>> >>>> RHEV, Red Hat.
>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards
>> >>>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> > >>>> > fre 2013-04-05 klockan 10:24 +0200 skrev Sandro 
>> Bonazzola: Hi >>>> Karli,
>> >>>> >> we're still working on it
>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Il 02/04/2013 12:22, Karli Sjöberg ha scritto:
>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >  Hi,
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> has there been any progress regarding this matter?
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Best Regards
>> >>>> >>> Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:12 +0000 skrev Karli 
>> Sjöberg:
>> >>>> >>>> fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:59 +0100 skrev Sandro Bonazzola: 
>> >>>> >>>>> Il 13/03/2013 12:24, Karli Sjöberg ha scritto:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> ons 2013-03-13 klockan 12:00 +0100 skrev Dave 
>> Neary: Hi >>>> Karli,
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On 03/11/2013 12:16 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > Hi,
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > in the absence of any official path,  we have started 
>> >>>> working >>>> >>>>>>> out our own
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > procedure for going from oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to >>>> 
>> >>>>>>> oVirt-3.2/Fedora 18.
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Indeed, I have not seen any documentation 
>> in the wiki yet >>>> on >>>> >>>>>>> upgrading >>>> >>>>>>> oVirt - 
>> would you be interested in writing up your >>>> experiences >>>> 
>> >>>>>>> there as >>>> >>>>>>> a guide to others?
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >>>>>>> Dave.
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>  That was my intention to share 
>> a working procedure once it >>>> was >>>> >>>>>> complete but I 
>> unfortunately hit a wall at >>>> "engine-upgrade". I >>>> >>>>>> 
>> would be very glad, and able to continue, if that obstacle >>>> could 
>> >>>> >>>>>> be lifted.
>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>  >>>> >>>>> My experience in upgrading from 
>> oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to >>>> >>>>> oVirt-3.2/Fedora 18:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fedora 17:
>> >>>> >>>>> Be sure to have the latest updates running: yum distro-sync
>> >>>> >>>>> Set exclude=ovirt* in /etc/yum.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> Execute: fedup --disablerepo=ovirt* --network 18
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> When you have a running Fedora 18:
>> >>>> >>>>> # systemctl list-units --failed
>> >>>> >>>>> UNIT               LOAD ACTIVE SUB    DESCRIPTION
>> >>>> >>>>> httpd.service      loaded failed failed The Apache HTTP 
>> >>>> Server
>> >>>> >>>>> postgresql.service loaded failed failed PostgreSQL 
>> database >>>> server
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # systemctl stop postgresql.service
>> >>>> >>>>> # tar cJvf pgsql-backup.tar.xz /var/lib/pgsql/data/
>> >>>> >>>>> # yum install postgresql-upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # cp /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf 
>> /root/pg_hba.conf.ovirt
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> edit /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf changing 
>> md5 to trust >>>> on the >>>> >>>>> local line.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # diff -u pg_hba.conf.ovirt pg_hba.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> --- pg_hba.conf.ovirt 2013-01-30 20:58:49.404000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> +++ pg_hba.conf 2013-01-30 20:59:06.709000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>>  # TYPE  DATABASE USER            ADDRESS             >>>> 
>> >>>> >>>>> METHOD
>> >>>> >>>>>  >>>> >>>>>  # "local" is for Unix domain socket 
>> connections only
>> >>>> >>>>> -local   all all                                 >>>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> md5
>> >>>> >>>>> +local   all all                                 >>>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> trust
>> >>>> >>>>>  # IPv4 local connections:
>> >>>> >>>>>  host    all all             127.0.0.1/32        >>>> >>>> 
>> >>>>> md5
>> >>>> >>>>>  # IPv6 local connections:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # postgresql-setup upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop  postgresql.service
>> >>>> >>>>> Upgrading database: OK
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> See /var/lib/pgsql/pgupgrade.log for details.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # cp /root/pg_hba.conf.ovirt 
>> /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> # systemctl postgrsql.service restart
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> edit /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf:
>> >>>> >>>>> # diff -u ssl.conf.ovirt ssl.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> --- ssl.conf.ovirt 2013-01-30 21:21:06.906000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> +++ ssl.conf    2013-01-30 21:22:02.757000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>>  # consult the online docs. You have been warned.  >>>> 
>> >>>>>  #
>> >>>> >>>>>  >>>> >>>>> -LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
>> >>>> >>>>> +#LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
>> >>>> >>>>>  >>>> >>>>>  #
>> >>>> >>>>>  # When we also provide SSL we have to listen to the >>>> 
>> >>>>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>>  #   Semaphore:
>> >>>> >>>>>  #   Configure the path to the mutual exclusion semaphore the
>> >>>> >>>>>  #   SSL engine uses internally for inter-process >>>> 
>> >>>>> synchronization. >>>> >>>>> -SSLMutex default
>> >>>> >>>>> +#SSLMutex default
>> >>>> >>>>>  >>>> >>>>>  #   Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG):
>> >>>> >>>>>  #   Configure one or more sources to seed the PRNG of the
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # /bin/systemctl restart  httpd.service
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Remove the line exclude=ovirt* from /etc/yum.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # yum update ovirt-engine-setup
>> >>>> >>>>> # engine-upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> However, during the upgrade I've stepped into 
>> >>>> >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906270
>> >>>> >>>>> We are still working on the upgrade actions.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>  Our procedures looks almost exactly the same, 
>> and we have >>>> gotten >>>> >>>> just as far as you have. Good to know.
>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> /Karli
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> -- 
>> >>>> >> Sandro Bonazzola
>> >>>> >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community 
>> >>>> >> collaboration.
>> >>>> >> See how it works at redhat.com
>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> >>>> > >>>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> > Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> >>>> > Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> >>>> > S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> >>>> > Phone:  +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> >>>> > karli.sjoberg at slu.se
>> >>>> >>>> >>>  >>> -- >>> >>> Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> >>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> Karli Sjöberg
>> >>> Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> >>> Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> >>> S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> >>> Phone:  +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> >>> karli.sjoberg at slu.se
>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Users mailing list
>> >>> Users at ovirt.org
>> >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >>> >>  >> >  > -- > > Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> > 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> > Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> > Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> > S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> > Phone:  +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> > karli.sjoberg at slu.se
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list