[Users] databases naming way is so confusing
Shireesh Anjal
sanjal at redhat.com
Thu Mar 7 05:30:26 UTC 2013
On 03/07/2013 08:23 AM, bigclouds wrote:
> hi, today i look into the databases,i find the way of naming of
> tables is so confusing.
> like vds_group==cluster,storage_pool==datacenter,........
> i think it is better straightforward.
I agree :)
I believe it's more of a 'legacy' issue.
>
> now i have not found which table is HOST.
The view VDS should provide most details of a HOST. The underlying
tables are VDS_STATIC, VDS_DYNAMIC and VDS_STATISTICS
Once you get that VDS is HOST, VDS_GROUP suddenly starts making sense :)
>
> i appreciate your hard work,but i hope my suggest is meaningful.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130307/3c13dbfe/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list