[Users] compatibility rhev-m (regged, valid entitlement) + ovirt rhev-h for lab part

[squadra]

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/01/2013 02:36 AM, squadra wrote:
>
>> Hi Itamar,
>>
>> yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
>> ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect
>> to break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
>> lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd
>> management node, based on ovirt is also overkill.
>>
>> lets see if its killing my pets
>>
>
> this isn't only about same cluster compatibility, rather potentially
> trying to use a verb which doesn't exist in ovirt-3.2 and assumed by rhev
> 3.2. so YMMV, a lot.
> for *sure* do not try to put them in same DC, or your rhev cluster/DC may
> suffer.
>


okay, stop scaring me ! sadly its the infrastructure without our company
simply said is completly down. so i wont try... but something else came to
my mind. we are redhat ready partner, so for i got access to nfr
subscriptions. will i get in trouble with the rh support when use nfr in
lab area controlled by a regular subscription? i know, ask rh support and
totally offtopic. sorry for that, but maybe someone knows or got his own
experience. especially when it comes to a support case and rh wants log
collection.


>
>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com
>> <mailto:iheim at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote:
>>
>>         hi,
>>
>>         i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h
>>         nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be
>>         wishable
>>         to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of
>> hostsystems
>>         which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live
>>         deploy of our
>>         stuff.
>>
>>         so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images
>> and
>>         rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work?
>>
>>         cheers,
>>
>>         juergen
>>
>>         --
>>
>>         Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>>
>>
>>         ______________________________**___________________
>>         Users mailing list
>>         Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
>>         http://lists.ovirt.org/__**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>         <http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>> >
>>
>>
>>     rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev
>>     versions are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or
>>     backported to rhev.
>>     I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
>


-- 

Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131101/c5c2c705/attachment-0001.html>