[Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Wed Nov 6 21:35:23 UTC 2013


On 11/06/2013 06:41 PM, Jakub Bittner wrote:
> Dne 7.10.2013 13:58, Juan Pablo Lorier napsal(a):
>> Thanks for the info.
>> Regards,
>>
>> On 06/10/13 17:26, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 08/29/2013 05:22 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think that one of the best things from Proxmox is the ability to
>>>> connect to any of the hosts via web and been able to admin the hole
>>>> infrastructure from there. This avoids the single point of failure that
>>>> today engine represents in ovirt plataform.
>>> hosted engine should resolve this one.
>>>
>>>> I agree with Jakub that been able to mix Intel and AMD hosts would be
>>>> great so we can use the hole of the servers into a DC and engine may
>>>> migrate VM to the same kind of processors if available but if not,
>>> as i replied just now, afaik, live migration between intel/amd isn't
>>> supported by kvm.
>>>
>>>> migrate to any available host and alert about the performance
>>>> degradation.
>>> you can't really migrate to a "lesser" host, only to at least same cpu
>>> level.
>>>
>>>> I'm still a rookie to ovirt so at this time I don't know all the
>>>> features to make further coments. I think you have a great product and
>>>> the best of it is the speed it's improving.
>>> thanks, glad to hear.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Hello,
>
> sorry for reopening old topic, but I have 1 (or 2) feature request to
> ovirt 3.4. It would be great to have possibility to edit network
> description and comment while it is attached to running VM. Second

please open an BZ RFE, maybe add to the 3.4 planning doc?

> feature request is fault tolerant VM. I did not find any info about this
> in ovirt discussion. Basically it means running same VM on two(or more)
> separated host where one is standard VM and the second one is exact copy
> (network, ram contents, disk, everything). When host where standard VM
> runs fails, then the mirrored VM should became standard one and continue
> operation without any user notice. Like HA, but without restart.

I think we're still waiting on this to be more robust in qemu-kvm first

>
> Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list