[Users] Live storage migration fails on CentOS 6.4 + ovirt3.3 cluster

Sander Grendelman sander at grendelman.com
Mon Nov 11 15:02:24 UTC 2013


I've sent an e-mail with this question to the centos mailing list:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-November/138344.html

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 12:00 PM, Sander Grendelman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Martijn Grendelman
>> <martijn.grendelman at isaac.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> So is qemu-kvm-rhev from mentioned source RPM a drop-in replacement for
>>> qemu-kvm from CentOS ? Would it make sense to install it instead of
>>> qemu-kvm?
>>
>>
>> That's the way it worked for me.
>>
>> - Put one host in maintenance
>> - Install *-rhev packas on that host
>>        yum localinstall qemu-*rhev*.rpm)
>>    this replaces the regular packages:
>>        Nov 06 16:15:38 Installed:
>> 2:qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
>>        Nov 06 16:15:40 Installed:
>> 2:qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
>>        Nov 06 16:15:40 Installed:
>> 2:qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
>>        Nov 06 16:15:40 Erased: qemu-kvm-tools
>>        Nov 06 16:15:41 Erased: qemu-kvm
>>        Nov 06 16:15:41 Erased: qemu-img
>> - Restart vdsm, enable host migrate test VM to host, test live storage
>> migration: OK
>> - Put host back in maintenance and reboot.
>> - Activate host and repeat maintenance/installation steps with other
>> hosts.
>>
>> The "solution" for the live snaphost problem as proposed in
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009100 is:
>>
>>       |BZ| Vdsm should check (hopefully via libvirt) if the underlying
>> qemu supports live snapshot, and report this feature to Engine.
>>       |BZ| If it does not, block this feature in UI.
>>
>> That is something that should be implemented, however,  there should
>> also be some way to use a full-featured kvm with oVirt.
>>
>> Can oVirt carry the qemu-*rhev* packages?
>> Or is this something that should be in epel? Or CentOS?
>
>
> I think worth veryfing with centos first on their plans to carry this
> package before we carry (and maintain it) in ovirt repos.
>



More information about the Users mailing list