[Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
amuller at redhat.com
Tue Nov 12 10:07:43 UTC 2013
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Hurrelmann" <patrick.hurrelmann at lobster.de>
To: "oVirt Mailing List" <users at ovirt.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM
Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
sorry for this rant, but...
I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't
even be installed in the most times. One time it required a future
selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much
lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires
"hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not
included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from?
Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again.
Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago):
/usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \
client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests
vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf
vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg
continuation line under-indented for visual indent
- How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating
to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to
broken vdsm rpms.
- How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares
"stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally
- How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and
released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm
just tracking on the wrong source tree...
Thx and Regards
Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg
HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich
Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
More information about the Users