[ovirt-users] Some questions

Maor Lipchuk mlipchuk at redhat.com
Thu Aug 14 15:51:34 UTC 2014


It depends on the supportedENGINEs which getVdsCaps will return.
Generally, VDSM for 3.x should keep supporting its 3.x previous minor versions.

Regards,
Maor

----- Original Message -----
From: "David cano bailen" <davidcano92 at gmail.com>
To: "Maor Lipchuk" <mlipchuk at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:02:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Some questions

hi,

my concern is that we have some critical MV. If the node enters into non
-operational state after upgrading the engine. Will be machines up?

I've been searching and upgrading should be progressive, 3.0 to 3.1, 3.1 to
3.2 ....
I guess if the nodes VDSM update to the latest version, and later I'll update
the engine version by version nodes wouldnt enter on non-operational state
and not suffer any court in MV. Am I right?

Thank you very much for your help


2014-08-14 11:10 GMT+02:00 Maor Lipchuk <mlipchuk at redhat.com>:

> Hi David,
>
> See my answers inline
>
> Regards,
> Maor
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David cano bailen" <davidcano92 at gmail.com>
> > To: users at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:04:10 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] Some questions
> >
> > Hi, i installed Engine 3.0 and Node Ovirt 2.6, but it seems very
> unestable.
> > Sometimes machines doesnt starts, nodes doesnt vinculate or UI doesnt
> work
> > fine. I have only 2 nodes and storage its on the same physical machine
> than
> > engine.
> >
> > -¿Does Node Ovirt 3.4 work with Engine 3.0?
> Engine 3.0 should support backward compatibility for ovirt 3.4. You can
> verify that on the node be executing the following command : "vdsClient -s
> 0 getVdsCaps" (-s for secure),
> There, you should see a supportedENGINEs list.
> > -¿Its necessary shutdown Nodes to do engine upgrade?
> no, but take in consideration that after upgrade, those hosts might get
> into non-operational state, in case VDSM version should be upgraded also.
> > -¿Are there any problem having the same physical machine for engine and
> > storage? ¿what are advantages have on diferents machines?
> There is no limitation of doing that,
> it's simply a question of the architecture you want to support.
> Separating the engine from the Storage server, might be useful to make it
> more high available.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>



More information about the Users mailing list