[ovirt-users] 1. Re: storage offload capability (Paul Jansen)
Itamar Heim
iheim at redhat.com
Mon Dec 15 14:29:07 UTC 2014
On 12/15/2014 04:26 PM, Nikolai Sednev wrote:
> Very needed functionality IMHO, even currently partially supported for
> cloning guest-vms using KVM and NetApp:
> http://captainkvm.com/2011/11/offload-cloning-from-kvm-to-the-back-end-storage/
for netapp this is available via the netapp vsc ui plugin
http://captainkvm.com/2014/02/vsc-for-rhev-is-ga-today/
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Nikolai
> ____________________
> Nikolai Sednev
> Senior Quality Engineer at Compute team
> Red Hat Israel
> 34 Jerusalem Road,
> Ra'anana, Israel 43501
>
> Tel: +972 9 7692043
> Mobile: +972 52 7342734
> Email: nsednev at redhat.com
> IRC: nsednev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *users-request at ovirt.org
> *To: *users at ovirt.org
> *Sent: *Monday, December 15, 2014 3:13:32 PM
> *Subject: *Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 81
>
> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> users at ovirt.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> users-request at ovirt.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-owner at ovirt.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: storage offload capability (Paul Jansen)
> 2. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi)
> 3. Re: How to update zanata's source text ? (Alexander Wels)
> 4. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola)
> 5. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi)
> 6. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola)
> 7. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:37:24 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Paul Jansen <vlaero at yahoo.com.au>
> To: Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com>, users <users at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] storage offload capability
> Message-ID:
> <1885607432.201949.1418643444273.JavaMail.yahoo at jws10632.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Itamar.I heard the other day that NFS v4.2 is supposed to contain
> server side copy, so it's possible that we might see this kind of
> support in one of more storage domain available to ovirt at some stage
> perhaps next year (in Fedora at least).Is this something that Gluster
> will also likely provide in a subsequent release once we have proper
> gfapi support?
> I'd be interested to hear if others on the list are clamouring for
> server side offload support in some form.
>
> From: Itamar Heim
> To: Paul Jansen ; users
> Sent: Saturday, 13 December 2014, 2:16
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] storage offload capability
>
> On 11/13/2014 06:09 AM, Paul Jansen wrote:
>
>
> > I have an ovirt 3.5 cluster set up with three el7 hosts.? Storage is
> > provided by two Fedora 20 machines and the connection is via multipath
> > iscsi.
> > The performance is quite good.? The Fedora 20 iscsi targets are using
> > the 'target' (ie: lio) framework, which support the various t.10 scsi
> > offloads.? Vmware supports a subset of these called VAAI and Microsoft
> > has a subset called ODX.
> > Cloning is one if the t.10 extensions that the lio target framework
> > supports.
> > I just tried cloning a vm and noticed that during the process there is a
> > lof of traffic over the iscsi interfaces on the Storage Pool Manager
> > host and the iscsi target machine.
> > With proper support for t.10 cloning I shoudn't see any traffic on the
> > isci links (or very minimal traffic)
> > Is there some way to enable the storage offload functionality in Ovirt?
> > If not, is this on the VDSM roadmap?? If support were worked in this
> > should be able to be applied to FCP connections as well.? The lio target
> > supports these offloads when acting as a Fiber Channel target also.
> >
> > I've asked this sometime back but there hasn't been much in the way of
> > discussion on this users list or the devel list about this feature.
> >
>
> yes, on the roadmap, tbd yet on when. netapp did a plugin enabling this
> for their storage array (VSC plugin)
> I hope the ceph integration will provide this, though that doesn't solve
> it for other type of storage domains yet.
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/7280fe9d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:30:05 +0100
> From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Users at ovirt.org" <Users at ovirt.org>, "devel at ovirt.org"
> <devel at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z
> Message-ID:
> <CAG2kNCxxvvjZ530jmboBGC4uvUj9+qVa0M_4baNPRiiE0cAnsQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > We have proposed Fedora 21 support as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature.
> > oVirt 3.5.z is now in maintenance phase so no new features should be
> added.
> > Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora 21, it
> > requires changes in several packages.
> > My question is, is there community interest in having Fedora 21 support
> > for oVirt 3.5.z while still having Fedora 20 as actively supported
> > distribution?
> >
> >
> Back in May (see http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/024004.html
> and following answers) we talked about Fedora Server and that Fedora 21
> Server would have been a preview of that...
>
> Now that it is out officially, it would be nice to see if oVirt
> Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as stated at
> https://getfedora.org/en/server/
>
> "
> Server Roles and Rolekit
> There's no need to set up your server from scratch when you use server
> roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Server system, providing a
> well-integrated service on top of the Fedora Server platform. Deploy and
> manage these prepared roles simply using the Rolekit tool.
> "
>
> Gianluca
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/78f95c51/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:45:41 -0500
> From: Alexander Wels <awels at redhat.com>
> To: users at ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] How to update zanata's source text ?
> Message-ID: <3574173.gs5KEaG2Rv at awels>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Sunday, December 14, 2014 03:03:56 PM plysan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I'm trying to compile ovirt-engine-3.5 branch with pulled zanata
> > source files, I get webadmin compilation errors. And the error
> message lead
> > me to the outdated zanata translation
> > file: org.ovirt.engine.ui.webadmin.ApplicationMessages
> > The file has a source text called "{0} (VLAN {1})", but recent commit
> > b068ec755198c27e65f936809104ba5068cd8fd2
> > has changed the text to "(VLAN {0})"
> >
> > So is there a way to update the zanata's source text (text on the left) ?
> > It seems that I don't get any options to update it, I can only update the
> > target text (text on the right).
> >
> > thanks.
>
> The zanata source text is generated from default values from the ovirt
> source
> code. Einav should know more about exactly how that is done. You should
> always
> match the translation to the source and not the other way around. So I
> am not
> sure why you are trying to change the source.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:48:16 +0100
> From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Users at ovirt.org" <Users at ovirt.org>, "devel at ovirt.org"
> <devel at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z
> Message-ID: <548ED890.9040307 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Il 15/12/2014 13:30, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> <sbonazzo at redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > We have proposed Fedora 21 support as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature.
> > oVirt 3.5.z is now in maintenance phase so no new features should
> be added.
> > Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora
> 21, it requires changes in several packages.
> > My question is, is there community interest in having Fedora 21
> support for oVirt 3.5.z while still having Fedora 20 as actively supported
> > distribution?
> >
> >
> > Back in May (see
> http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/024004.html and
> following answers) we talked about Fedora Server and that Fedora 21
> > Server would have been a preview of that...
> >
> > Now that it is out officially, it would be nice to see if oVirt
> Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as stated at
> > https://getfedora.org/en/server/
> >
> > "
> > Server Roles and Rolekit
> > There's no need to set up your server from scratch when you use
> server roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Server system, providing a
> > well-integrated service on top of the Fedora Server platform. Deploy
> and manage these prepared roles simply using the Rolekit tool.
> > "
> >
>
> I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z.
> I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6.
> BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
>
> > Gianluca
> >
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:18 +0100
> From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Users at ovirt.org" <Users at ovirt.org>, "devel at ovirt.org"
> <devel at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z
> Message-ID:
> <CAG2kNCzvaAQTm7zR3Kn8CsQYi20w5A3jKiCMFje_-s-P=E7eCw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm
> > not even sure if we can make it for 3.6.
> > BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
> >
> > --
> > Sandro Bonazzola
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> > See how it works at redhat.com
> >
>
> Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236
>
> Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for oVirt
> Hypervisor? And in that case against what component?
>
> Gianluca
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/973e004e/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:12:02 +0100
> From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch at redhat.com>, "Users at ovirt.org"
> <Users at ovirt.org>, "devel at ovirt.org" <devel at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z
> Message-ID: <548EDE22.5040603 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
> <sbonazzo at redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in
> 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6.
> > BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
> >
> > --
> > Sandro Bonazzola
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> collaboration.
> > See how it works at redhat.com <http://redhat.com>
> >
> >
> > Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236
> >
> > Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for
> oVirt Hypervisor? And in that case against what component?
>
> Fabian?
>
> >
> > Gianluca
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:13:29 +0100
> From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch at redhat.com>, "Users at ovirt.org"
> <Users at ovirt.org>, "devel at ovirt.org" <devel at ovirt.org>
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z
> Message-ID:
> <CAG2kNCxgC68TcYFJhdRs7_oWJnM4JF7XRekDWU4bz5dnWhmG8g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com
> > <mailto:sbonazzo at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in
> > 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6.
> > > BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sandro Bonazzola
> > > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
> > collaboration.
> > > See how it works at redhat.com <http://redhat.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236
> > >
> > > Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for oVirt
> > Hypervisor? And in that case against what component?
> >
> > Fabian?
> >
> > >
> > > Gianluca
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandro Bonazzola
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> > See how it works at redhat.com
> >
>
> BTW: I put [RFE] at beginning of subject. I hope it is sufficient to mark
> it as an enhancement bugzilla entry...
>
> Gianluca
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/870c20b7/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 81
> *************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list