[ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darrell Budic)
Nikolai Sednev
nsednev at redhat.com
Sun Dec 21 12:08:26 UTC 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168478
SR-IOV target release 3.6 and you'll need appropriate NIC on your Host, supporting this functionality http://wiki.ovirt.org/Feature/SR-IOV
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Nikolai
____________________
Nikolai Sednev
Senior Quality Engineer at Compute team
Red Hat Israel
34 Jerusalem Road,
Ra'anana, Israel 43501
Tel: +972 9 7692043
Mobile: +972 52 7342734
Email: nsednev at redhat.com
IRC: nsednev
----- Original Message -----
From: users-request at ovirt.org
To: users at ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 8:22:17 PM
Subject: Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135
Send Users mailing list submissions to
users at ovirt.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
users-request at ovirt.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
users-owner at ovirt.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: console viewer for ovrit engine (Yue, Cong)
2. Re: Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darrell Budic)
3. Re: VM failover with ovirt3.5 (Yue, Cong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:03:11 -0800
From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com>
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos at redhat.com>
Cc: "users at ovirt.org" <users at ovirt.org>
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
Message-ID:
<ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF291 at svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
So. It means the web-proxy should be installed into the engine inside the virt nodes where host the VM.
The ovirt engine is with centos 6.6.
I will have a try for this later.
Thanks,
Cong
-----Original Message-----
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos at redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:31 AM
To: Yue, Cong
Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com>
> To: "Simone Tiraboschi" <stirabos at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>, users at ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:39:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
> Sorry. It is centos 7 for host.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yue, Cong
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:38 AM
> To: 'Simone Tiraboschi'
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users at ovirt.org
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> Yes, I am using centos for host. What engine host in your definition?
> Is the host PC where engine VM is running on the top?
The physical host or VM witch runs the engine.
> I am doing the walkthrough as
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5
> /
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/11/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5
> -part-two/
>
> I am glad to test your new 3.5.1 in my environment.
>
> Thanks,
> Cong
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos at redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:02 AM
> To: Yue, Cong
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users at ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com>
> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com>
> > Cc: users at ovirt.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:45:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
> >
> >
> >
> > I checked but also it saids there is no such package. It works now
> > with my native client.
> >
> > Some strange..
>
> The oVirt websocket proxy is part of the engine and it's by default
> installed on the engine host when you install the engine; engine-setup
> asks if you want to configure it or not.
> Than, if you really need for your network design, you can also install
> and configure the websocket proxy on a different host.
> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/WebSocketProxy_on_a_separate_host
> but this is already a special case.
>
> I read in this thread that you are using centos7 (also for the engine host?).
> We didn't release oVirt 3.5.0 for el7 but we'll do since 3.5.1 which
> is targeted just after Christmas vacation (you are welcome to help us
> testing it on centos7!) so now you still cannot find
> ovirt-websocket-proxy rpm for
> el7 on the stable branch.
> If you really need to install it right now on el7 you can try from
> nightly snapshot.
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gianluca Cecchi [mailto:gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:07 PM
> > To: Yue, Cong
> > Cc: Donny Davis; awels at redhat.com; users at ovirt.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Yue, Cong <
> > Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, but it saids there is no ovirt-websocket-proxy packges.
> > I am using the repository of
> > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release35.rpm
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The package, at least in 3.5 is
> > ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy
> >
> >
> > Gianluca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> > reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you
> > are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of
> > this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the
> > sender's e-mail System Administrator.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
>
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:08:03 -0600
From: Darrell Budic <budic at onholyground.com>
To: "Kalil de A. Carvalho" <kalilac at gmail.com>
Cc: Amador Segundo <asegundo at redhat.com>, users at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is
possible?
Message-ID: <B6ECAED5-7CE3-44D2-A4E8-90EF46B3203D at onholyground.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I tried a quick iperf test a while back and got 3-4Gb/sec between a pair of VMs on separate hosts with a 10G infrastructure, no real tuning and no SRIOV. That met my needs so I didn?t try anything further. If you were aiming for 10G for all, you?d want to work on SRIOV I imagine, but they get pretty good performance even without it.
> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Kalil de A. Carvalho <kalilac at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Amador.
>
> No, unfortunately not.
>
> This was just a friend question, because he need VM with 10GB NIC's.
>
> Today he is using Xenserver, this solution does not attend his expedition and he is research another solution.
>
> I told him about oVirt/KVM but this is a prerequisite to use.
>
> I will plan with him to try make a project to test a take the resolts.
>
> Best regards.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Amador Segundo <asegundo at redhat.com <mailto:asegundo at redhat.com>> wrote:
> Virtio devices does not support speed, so we fake their speeds showing "1000mbps" in Admin. Portal. If your boxes have 10gbps devices then your vms are already taking advantage of that. Did you test it? Could you share some results?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kalil de A. Carvalho [kalilac at gmail.com <mailto:kalilac at gmail.com>]
> Received: Thursday, 18 Dec 2014, 22:59
> To: users at ovirt.org <mailto:users at ovirt.org>
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible?
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> Today a follow work ask me if is possible to use vNIC or vbridge in a VM managed by ovirt.
>
> What he wants is to have a virtual 10gb network to some machines.
>
> All hosts NIC's are 10gb.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> If yes how can I do it?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Atenciosamente,
> Kalil de A. Carvalho
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141219/e2a27490/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:22:10 -0800
From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com>
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos at redhat.com>
Cc: "users at ovirt.org" <users at ovirt.org>
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
Message-ID:
<ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF2F1 at svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks for the information. This is the log for my three ovirt nodes.
>From the output of hosted-engine --vm-status, it shows the engine state for my 2nd and 3rd ovirt node is DOWN.
Is this the reason why VM failover not work in my environment? How can I make also engine works for my 2nd and 3rd ovit nodes?
--
--== Host 1 status ==--
Status up-to-date : True
Hostname : 10.0.0.94
Host ID : 1
Engine status : {"health": "good", "vm": "up",
"detail": "up"}
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 150475
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=150475 (Fri Dec 19 13:12:18 2014)
host-id=1
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineUp
--== Host 2 status ==--
Status up-to-date : True
Hostname : 10.0.0.93
Host ID : 2
Engine status : {"reason": "vm not running on
this host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"}
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 1572
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=1572 (Fri Dec 19 10:12:18 2014)
host-id=2
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineDown
--== Host 3 status ==--
Status up-to-date : False
Hostname : 10.0.0.92
Host ID : 3
Engine status : unknown stale-data
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 987
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=987 (Fri Dec 19 10:09:58 2014)
host-id=3
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineDown
--
And the /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/agent.log for three ovirt nodes are as follows:
--
10.0.0.94(hosted-engine-1)
---
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,342::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
Engine vm running on localhost
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::160::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Global metadata: {'maintenance': False}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Host 10.0.0.93 (id 2): {'extra':
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=1448
(Fri Dec 19 10:10:14
2014)\nhost-id=2\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n',
'hostname': '10.0.0.93', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 2, 'engine-status':
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm':
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False,
'host-ts': 1448}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Host 10.0.0.92 (id 3): {'extra':
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=987
(Fri Dec 19 10:09:58
2014)\nhost-id=3\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n',
'hostname': '10.0.0.92', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 3, 'engine-status':
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm':
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False,
'host-ts': 987}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,658::state_machine::168::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Local (id 1): {'engine-health': {'health': 'good', 'vm': 'up',
'detail': 'up'}, 'bridge': True, 'mem-free': 1079.0, 'maintenance':
False, 'cpu-load': 0.0269, 'gateway': True}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:45,784::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:45,785::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,109::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
Engine vm running on localhost
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
----
10.0.0.93 (hosted-engine-2)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:28,651::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:28,652::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
10.0.0.92(hosted-engine-3)
same as 10.0.0.93
--
-----Original Message-----
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos at redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:28 AM
To: Yue, Cong
Cc: users at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue at alliedtelesis.com>
> To: users at ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:14:33 AM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> In my environment, I have 3 ovirt nodes as one cluster. And on top of
> host-1, there is one vm to host ovirt engine.
>
> Also I have one external storage for the cluster to use as data domain
> of engine and data.
>
> I confirmed live migration works well in my environment.
>
> But it seems very buggy for VM failover if I try to force to shut down
> one ovirt node. Sometimes the VM in the node which is shutdown can
> migrate to other host, but it take more than several minutes.
>
> Sometimes, it can not migrate at all. Sometimes, only when the host is
> back, the VM is beginning to move.
Can you please check or share the logs under /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/ ?
> Is there some documentation to explain how VM failover is working? And
> is there some bugs reported related with this?
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine#Agent_State_Diagram
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Cong
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135
**************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141221/6ce5bf73/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list