[Users] Opinions needed: 3 node gluster replica 3 | NFS async | snapshots for consistency
Ayal Baron
abaron at redhat.com
Sun Feb 23 09:27:41 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> I'm looking for some opinions on this configuration in an effort to increase
> write performance:
>
> 3 storage nodes using glusterfs in replica 3, quorum.
gluster doesn't support replica 3 yet, so I'm not sure how heavily I'd rely on this.
> Ovirt storage domain via NFS
why NFS and not gluster?
> Volume set nfs.trusted-sync on
> On Ovirt, taking snapshots often enough to recover from a storage crash
Note that this would have negative write performance impact
> Using CTDB to manage NFS storage domain IP, moving it to another storage node
> when necessary
>
> Something along the lines of EC2's data consistency model, where only
> snapshots can be considered reliable. The Ovirt added advantage would be
> memory consistency at time of snapshot as well.
>
> Feedback appreciated, including 'you are insane for thinking this is a good
> idea' (and some supported reasoning would be great).
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Steve Dainard
> IT Infrastructure Manager
> Miovision | Rethink Traffic
>
> Blog | LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook
> Miovision Technologies Inc. | 148 Manitou Drive, Suite 101, Kitchener, ON,
> Canada | N2C 1L3
> This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
> attachments and notify us immediately.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list