[Users] Gluster storage

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:25:05AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Dan Kenigsberg  wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:04:03PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> There are two ways in which GlusterFS can be used as a storage domain:
> >>
> >> a) Use gluster native/fuse access with POSIXFS
> >>
> >> b) Use the gluster native storage domain to bypass fuse (with
> >> libgfapi). We are currently addressing an issue in libvirt
> >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017289) to enable
> >> snapshot support with libgfapi. Once this is addressed, we will have
> >> libgfapi support in the native storage domain.
> >
> > It won't be as immediate, since there's a required fix on Vdsm's side
> > (Bug 1022961 - Running a VM from a gluster domain uses mount instead of
> > gluster URI)
> >
> >> Till then, fuse would
> >> be used with native storage domain. You can find more details about
> >> native storage domain here:
> >>
> >> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GlusterFS_Storage_Domain
> rg/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> Hello,
> revamping here....
> I'm using oVirt 3.3.3 beta1 after upgrade from 3.3.2 on fedora 19
> ovirt beta repo
> It seems bug referred by Vijay (1017289) is still marked as
> "assigned", but actually it is for rhel 6.
> Bug referred by Dan (1022961) is marked as "blocked" but I don't see
> any particular updates since late november. But it is for rhevm, so I
> think it is for rhel 6...
> So what is the situation for fedora 19 and oVirt in upcoming 3.3.3?
> And upcoming fedora 19/20 and 3.4?

Neither bug has been fixed as of yet, I'm afraid.
You should seem them change state to POST when there's code to be seen.

Dan.