[Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression

[Karli Sjöberg]

ons 2014-01-08 klockan 01:35 -0500 skrev Doron Fediuck:
> Hi guys, 
> As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need
> to verify tuned exists.

Are "ksmtuned" and "tuned" different?
# cat /etc/redhat-release 
CentOS release 6.5 (Final)
# service --status-all | grep tuned
ksmtuned (pid  10438) is running...
# chkconfig | grep tuned
ksmtuned       	0:off	1:off	2:off	3:on	4:on	5:on	6:off

/K

> Once available, we'll be able to handle
> the relevant profiles for hypervisors.
> 
> 
> Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos?
> 
> 
 <-------- הודעה מקורית --------
 <מאת: Amedeo Salvati 
 <תאריך:08/01/2014 00:32 (GMT+02:00) 
 <אל: users at ovirt.org,tmiller at hcjb.org 
 <נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla
 <orRegression 
> 
> Hi Ted,
> 
> 
> I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I
> can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host
> profile?
> 
> 
> Best regards
> a
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000
> From: Ted Miller <tmiller at hcjb.org>
> To: oVirt Mailing List <users at ovirt.org>
> Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or
> Regression
> Message-ID:
> <a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b at DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
> 
> One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use.  At
> the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error.  It is now just
> a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host.  But, as a
> warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.
> 
> When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a
> "rhs-virtualization" profile.  That profile is not included in Centos.
> I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
> 
> I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla
> 987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where
> "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV +
> RHS.  I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine
> RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not
> appropriate.
> 
> My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses
> "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it
> falls back to "virtual-host".  (I don't know what (if any) differences
> there are between the two profiles.)
> 
> Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other
> path?
> 
> Ted Miller
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Inviato da Tablet Samsung

-- 

Med Vänliga Hälsningar

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karli Sjöberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address
Kronåsvägen 8)
S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Phone:  +46-(0)18-67 15 66
karli.sjoberg at slu.se