[Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression

Wed Jan 8 07:56:05 UTC 2014

hi Doron, I can confirm you that tuned is present on centos6.x:[root at centos6 ~]# rpm -qa |grep centos-releasecentos-release-6-5.el6.centos.11.2.x86_64[root at centos6 ~]# service tuned statustuned (pid  2126) is running...[root at centos6 ~]# tuned-adm listAvailable profiles:- latency-performance- spindown-disk- sap- desktop-powersave- throughput-performance- virtual-host- virtual-guest- enterprise-storage- server-powersave- laptop-battery-powersave- laptop-ac-powersave- defaultCurrent active profile: virtual-host[root at centos6 ~]# rpm -qa | grep tuned | xargs rpm -q --infoName        : tuned                        Relocations: (not relocatable)Version     : 0.2.19                            Vendor: CentOSRelease     : 13.el6                        Build Date: ven 22 nov 2013 13:33:51 CETInstall Date: lun 06 gen 2014 13:03:52 CET      Build Host: c6b8.bsys.dev.centos.orgGroup       : System Environment/Daemons    Source RPM: tuned-0.2.19-13.el6.src.rpmSize        : 227505                           License: GPLv2+Signature   : RSA/SHA1, dom 24 nov 2013 20:30:33 CET, Key ID 0946fca2c105b9dePackager    : CentOS BuildSystem <http://bugs.centos.org>URL         : https://fedorahosted.org/tuned/Summary     : A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemonDescription :The tuned package contains a daemon that tunes system settings dynamically.It does so by monitoring the usage of several system components periodically.Based on that information components will then be put into lower or higherpower saving modes to adapt to the current usage. Currently only ethernetnetwork and ATA harddisk devices are implemented.[root at centos6 ~]# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler noop anticipatory [deadline] cfq [root at centos6 ~]#can you share rhs-virtualization profile with us? best regardsa
Da: "Doron Fediuck" dfediuck at redhat.com
A: "Amedeo Salvati" amedeo at oscert.net, users at ovirt.org, tmiller at hcjb.org
Cc: "Jiri Moskovcak" jmoskovc at redhat.com
Data: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 01:35:38 -0500 (EST)
Oggetto: Re: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression

> Hi guys, 
> As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need to verify tuned exists.
> Once available, we'll be able to handle
> the relevant profiles for hypervisors.

> Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos?> -------- הודעה מקורית --------> מאת: Amedeo Salvati  > תאריך:08/01/2014  00:32  (GMT+02:00) > אל: users at ovirt.org,tmiller at hcjb.org > נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla orRegression > Hi Ted,

> I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host profile?

> Best regards
> a

> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000> From: Ted Miller <tmiller at hcjb.org>> To: oVirt Mailing List <users at ovirt.org>> Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or> Regression> Message-ID:> <a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b at DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"> I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.> One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use.  At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error.  It is now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host.  But, as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.> When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virtualization" profile.  That profile is not included in Centos.  I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.> I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS.  I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.> My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual-host".  (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two profiles.)> Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?> Ted Miller

> Inviato da Tablet Samsung 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140108/380ebccb/attachment-0001.html>