[Users] iSCSI storage domain.

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Fri Jan 17 22:01:21 UTC 2014


On 01/17/2014 11:32 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Elad Ben Aharon  wrote:
>> Indeed,
>> Using ovirt-engine APIs you can edit your iSCSI storage domain and extend it by adding physical volumes from your shared storage (The process is managed by ovirt-engine, the actual actions on your storage are done by your host which has VDSM installed on).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Hans Emmanuel" <hansemmanuel at gmail.com>
>> To: "Elad Ben Aharon" <ebenahar at redhat.com>
>> Cc: users at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 6:37:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] iSCSI storage domain.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply .
>>
>>
>> Are you suggesting to use Ovirt Engine to resize iSCSI storage domain ?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Elad Ben Aharon <ebenahar at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Both storage types are suitable for production setup.
>>> As for your second question -
>>> manually LVM resizing is not recommended, why not using RHEVM for that?
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Hans Emmanuel" <hansemmanuel at gmail.com>
>>> To: users at ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 3:30:39 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] iSCSI storage domain.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could any one please give valuable suggestions?
>>> On 16-Jan-2014 12:28 PM, "Hans Emmanuel" < hansemmanuel at gmail.com > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to get some comparison on NFS & iSCSI storage domain . Which
>>> one more suitable for a production setup ? I am planning to use LVM backed
>>> DRBD replication . And also is that possible to expand iSCSI storage domain
>>> by simply resizing backend LVM ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hans Emmanuel
>
>
> I think one option should be to provide the user, if not already
> present/tested/supported, the opportunity to resize the LUN on storage
> array and then run a rescan from oVIrt to see the new size and use it
> without disruption of service.

3.4 adds this:
Bug 961532 - [RFE] Update storage domain's LUNs sizes in DB after lun 
resize

please note:
- you can extend a *storage domain* by adding an extra LUN to it from
   ovirt-engine.
- you *cannot* resize the LUN from ovirt-engine, but you can do that
   from the storage side, which in 3.4 will be reported by ovirt-engine
   via bug 961532

and on the general question - what i like about NFS is its way more 
simple to work with, troubleshoot, inject and recover on issues.

also note, on iscsi, LVM has issues on scale once you pass a several 
hundreds of disks or snapshots (per storage domain).

> To avoid also LUNs proliferation on storage arrays that in general are
> providing storage to many sources, also different from oVirt itself
> Gianluca
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>




More information about the Users mailing list