[Users] vlan on mgmt network

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Sat Jan 18 17:11:56 UTC 2014


On 01/18/2014 04:52 PM, Peter Styk wrote:
> So I got ovirtmgmt VM ticked off. Had to remove it from all VM's then
> tried to add new Logical network to eth0 by drag & drop but refused
> since ovirtmgmt was out of sync. So I synced it. ....and that's how I
> lost access to my hosted remote system. End of story. So that's it I
> guess, automated install doesn't work (during switch network goes dead
> and doesn't come back remote access is lost) so I found manual way that
> works. But then I need to sync it to get my ovirtmgmt not to be a VM
> network. And even if its not to get another network on the interface i
> need to sync it.....

this sounds like a bug - can you provide clear reproduction steps?

>
> I will keep trying, Thanks for the tips.
> P.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17 January 2014 22:06, Itamar Heim <iheim at redhat.com
> <mailto:iheim at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 01/18/2014 12:05 AM, William Kwan wrote:
>
>         I tried to define a virtual interface for vlan102, by
>         adding ifcfg-bond0.102
>         manually and restarted network services.
>
>
>     why not via ovirt-engine?
>
>
>
>
>
>         On Friday, January 17, 2014 4:45 PM, Itamar Heim
>         <iheim at redhat.com <mailto:iheim at redhat.com>> wrote:
>         On 01/17/2014 11:38 PM, William Kwan wrote:
>           > OK..  tested with bond0.102 for vlan102
>           > I guess I can't do this with oVirt?  It wouldn't pickup this
>         interface.
>           > It still shows up eth0, eth1 and bond0 only
>
>         you tried to define a vlan youself on the bond, or use a vlan via a
>         logical network over the bond via ovirt-engine (which should work)?
>
>
>           >
>           > Will
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           > On Friday, January 17, 2014 1:15 PM, William Kwan
>         <potatok at yahoo.com <mailto:potatok at yahoo.com>
>         <mailto:potatok at yahoo.com <mailto:potatok at yahoo.com>>> wrote:
>           > Thanks all for the info. I'm trying the suggestions with
>         3.3.2-1.el6
>           >
>           > Assaf mentioned the following which is true.
>           > You can make ovirtmgmt a non-VM, untagged (non-VLAN)
>         network, then place
>           > as many VM, tagged networks as you'd like on the same NIC or
>         bond.
>           >
>           > I tried a few things and I haven't been able to find a way
>         through.
>           > Obviously or not, there are more facts/rules.  Just put up a
>         few of them
>           > here
>           >
>           > Cannot have more than one non-VLAN network on one interface
>           > Cannot have a non-VLAN VM network and VLAN-tagged networks
>         on one
>           > interface. ( got this when I tried to drag a VLAN-tagged VM
>         network on
>           > the same interface as the non-VLAN VM network).
>           >
>           > I'll try to test adding a bond0.<vlan>.  I need to have
>           > bond0 - for both mgmt network and a vlan
>           > bond1 - for another subnet.
>           >
>           > Will
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           > On Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:50 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier
>           > <jplorier at gmail.com <mailto:jplorier at gmail.com>
>         <mailto:jplorier at gmail.com <mailto:jplorier at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>           > Hi William,
>           >
>           > You can have several logical networks on the same interface. If
>           > ovirtmgmt is not a vm network you can even mix tagged and
>         untagged
>           > networks (if not, you can't mix). You don's have to do
>         anything besides
>           > creating the logical networks in ovirt and assign them to
>         the interface,
>           > ovirt takes care of creating the virtual interfaces it needs.
>           > What you can't do is have more than one logical network per
>         vlan (I
>           > think there's a feature request on this, I know I've asked
>         it on the
>           >
>           > list:-) ).
>           > Regards,
>
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           >
>           > _________________________________________________
>           > Users mailing list
>           > Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
>         <mailto:Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>>
>           > http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users
>         <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>           >
>
>
>
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at ovirt.org <mailto:Users at ovirt.org>
>     http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users
>     <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>




More information about the Users mailing list