[Users] Centos 6.5 and bonding: "A slave interface is not properly configured"

Federico Alberto Sayd fsayd at uncu.edu.ar
Fri Jan 24 14:06:11 UTC 2014


On 24/01/14 08:31, Moti Asayag wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Federico Alberto Sayd" <fsayd at uncu.edu.ar>
>> To: users at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:57:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] Centos 6.5 and bonding: "A slave interface is not properly configured"
>>
>> On 23/01/14 07:02, Moti Asayag wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Federico Sayd" <fsayd at uncu.edu.ar>
>>>> To: users at ovirt.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 2:22:01 AM
>>>> Subject: [Users] Centos 6.5 and bonding: "A slave interface is not
>>>> properly	configured"
>>>>
>>>> Hello:
>>>>
>>>> I am having problems with bonding
>>>>
>>>> I have installed Centos 6.5 in order to use it as host. I configured eth0
>>>> with the vlan of the management network (Vlan 70). Then I registered the
>>>> host to the engine (3.3.2-1-el6) and the engine installed oVirt in the
>>>> host
>>>> without problem. Ovirtmgmt was created automatically and bridged with
>>>> eth0.70.
>>>>
>>>> Now I need to bond a second network interface (eth1) with eth0. But when I
>>>> try to bond the nics, I get the next error:
>>>>
>>> Could you describe how you've created the bond ? via webadmin setup
>>> networks
>>> dialog or via api ?
>>>
>>>
>> Via webadmin Setup Network (Web GUI)
> Does the setup dialog presents the new configuration when you create the bond ?
> Meaning, does it draw the following ?
> eth0 --
>         |--bond0 --- ovirtmgmt (vlan 70)
> eth1 --
>
> If it does, this is simply bug in the UI which should have better construct
> the parameters to the setup networks.
>
> Could you open a bug for it ?
>
> You may use the setup networks api (via rest-client or using the sdk) to specify
> the target configuration.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
No, the bond is never displayed in the web UI, the error prevents the 
bond creation. I already solved the problem, only I think that would be 
fine if the UI error be more explicit and include info about to the 
interface or interfaces with problematic configurations.

I don't know if supervdsm.log or vdsm.log make reference to the 
interfaces that have unacceptable configurations.



More information about the Users mailing list