[Users] oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions
Omer Frenkel
ofrenkel at redhat.com
Mon Jan 27 15:31:56 UTC 2014
Thanks for the feedback! much appreciated.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce at redhat.com>
> To: "oVirt Users List" <users at ovirt.org>
> Cc: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel at redhat.com>, "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:12:38 PM
> Subject: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions
>
> Feature tested:
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Template_Versions
>
> - create a new vm vm1 and make a template template1 from it
> - create a new vm vm2 based on template1 and make some changes
> - upgrade to 3.4
> - create a new template template1.1 from vm2
> - create a new vm vm3 from template1 (clone) - content ok
> - create a new vm vm4 from template1.1 (thin) - content ok
> - create a new vm vm5 from template1 last (thin) - content ok (same as 1.1)
> - try to remove template1 (failed as template1.1 is still present)
> - try to remove template1.1 (failed as vm5 is still present)
> - create a new vm vm6 and make a template blank1.1 as new version of the
> blank template (succeeded)
> - create a vm pool vmpool1 with the "latest" template from template1
> - create a vm pool vmpool2 with the "template1.1" (last) template from
> template1
> - start vmpool1 and vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same
> - create a new template template1.2
> - start vmpool1 and verify that the content is the same as latest
> (template1.2)
> - start vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same as template1.1
>
> Suggestions:
>
> - the template blank is special, I am not sure if allowing versioning may
> be confusing (for example is not even editable)
right, i also thought about this, and my thought was not to block the user from doing this,
but if it was confusing we better block it.
> - as far as I can see the "Sub Version Name" is not editable anymore (after
> picking it)
thanks, i see its missing in the UI, do you care to open a bug on that?
>
> --
> Federico
>
More information about the Users
mailing list