[Users] oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions

[Federico Simoncelli]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel at redhat.com>
> To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce at redhat.com>
> Cc: "oVirt Users List" <users at ovirt.org>, "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:31:56 PM
> Subject: Re: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions
> 
> Thanks for the feedback! much appreciated.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce at redhat.com>
> > To: "oVirt Users List" <users at ovirt.org>
> > Cc: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel at redhat.com>, "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:12:38 PM
> > Subject: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions
> > 
> > Feature tested:
> > 
> > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Template_Versions
> > 
> > - create a new vm vm1 and make a template template1 from it
> > - create a new vm vm2 based on template1 and make some changes
> > - upgrade to 3.4
> > - create a new template template1.1 from vm2
> > - create a new vm vm3 from template1 (clone) - content ok
> > - create a new vm vm4 from template1.1 (thin) - content ok
> > - create a new vm vm5 from template1 last (thin) - content ok (same as 1.1)
> > - try to remove template1 (failed as template1.1 is still present)
> > - try to remove template1.1 (failed as vm5 is still present)
> > - create a new vm vm6 and make a template blank1.1 as new version of the
> >   blank template (succeeded)
> > - create a vm pool vmpool1 with the "latest" template from template1
> > - create a vm pool vmpool2 with the "template1.1" (last) template from
> > template1
> > - start vmpool1 and vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same
> > - create a new template template1.2
> > - start vmpool1 and verify that the content is the same as latest
> > (template1.2)
> > - start vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same as template1.1
> > 
> > Suggestions:
> > 
> > - the template blank is special, I am not sure if allowing versioning may
> >   be confusing (for example is not even editable)
> 
> right, i also thought about this, and my thought was not to block the user
> from doing this,
> but if it was confusing we better block it.
> 
> > - as far as I can see the "Sub Version Name" is not editable anymore (after
> >   picking it)
> 
> thanks, i see its missing in the UI, do you care to open a bug on that?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058501 

-- 
Federico