[Users] Users Digest, Vol 28, Issue 299

[Ertan ERBEK]

Fnaly I fix my problem with following step

1) Check your maximum shared memory :
$ |sudo cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax
33554432|

You need to increase the shared memory to fix this.

2) To fix it temporarily, run this command :
$ |sudo sysctl -w kernel.shmmax=134217728|

3) To fix this permenantly, set this in your configuration:
$ |sudo vi /etc/sysctl.conf
kernel.shmmax = 134217728

|


On 28-01-2014 15:02, users-request at ovirt.org wrote:
> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> 	users at ovirt.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	users-request at ovirt.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	users-owner at ovirt.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Multi-Host Network Configuration (Piotr Kliczewski)
>     2. ovirt-3.3.3 release postponed due to blockers (Sandro Bonazzola)
>     3. Re: Vm's being paused (Neil)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:28:43 +0100
> From: Piotr Kliczewski <piotr.kliczewski at gmail.com>
> To: Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
> Cc: users at ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] Multi-Host Network Configuration
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAKU0_rnOGobq35prWuaC+RVXEOQd00z3cjDAf4NEZG+3BSZKzg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 04:23:47PM +0100, Piotr Kliczewski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I played with multi host network config and used two boxes to test it.
>>> One el6 (vdsm) and f19 (engine, vdsm). During the test I noticed that
>>> vdsm on f19 haven't joined to cluster (known issue). I performed
>>> modification of vlan and MTU. Both boxes were modified but I noticed
>>> that by accident I modified ovirtmgmt network and I noticed that I
>>> lost connectivity. el6 box recovered whereas f19 haven't. I think it
>>> was because the vdsm was local to the engine.
>> That may be so. To make sure, I'd love to see your vdsm.log and
>> supervdsm.log of the time of the modification.
>>
> I do not have the logs anymore but will try to recreate it and send
> you the logs.
>
>>> I spend sometime trying
>>> to recover network configuration.
>> Thanks for testing this feature.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:55:43 +0100
> From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: arch <arch at ovirt.org>, engine-devel <engine-devel at ovirt.org>,
> 	"Users at ovirt.org" <Users at ovirt.org>,	VDSM Project Development
> 	<vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
> Subject: [Users] ovirt-3.3.3 release postponed due to blockers
> Message-ID: <52E7A8CF.6040301 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>
> Hi,
> oVirt 3.3.3 release need to be postponed.
> A recent release of python-cpopen-1.3 is breaking dependency resolution on EL6 and F19 so vdsm can't be installed and node can't be composed.
> A recent change in vdsm-python-cpopen added the needed conflict against python-cpopen and removed Provides / Obsoletes on python-cpopen.
> But no new releases of python-cpopen is available fixing the correct Provides / Obsoletes pair.
>
> oVirt 3.3.2 / stable is affected too.
>
> Please fix
> Bug 1056470 - python-cpopen-1.3 is not providing obsoleted package.
> Bug 1056464 - python-cpopen-1.3 is not providing obsoleted package.
> ASAP.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140128/b5265275/attachment-0001.html>