[ovirt-users] Adding Fedora 20 Support

[plysan]

2014-06-03 2:59 GMT+08:00 Justin Brown <justin.brown at fandingo.org>:

> Hello,
>
> I recently came across the LWN article on oVirt 3.4
> (http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/600370/dfa9cdd4f5ee0bb3/) and was
> discussing the lack of Fedora 20 support with an oVirt contributor,
> bkp.
>
> It's been 4 months since I last looked at running oVirt. I use Fedora
> 20 on all of my infrastructure, so I was quite surprised that there is
> still not support for running the engine on F20. Anyways, rather than
> just complaining, I figured it would be more helpful to volunteer some
> time to fix the issue.
>
> 1) I've tried looking through the oVirt bug reports to see what's
> happening with Fedora 20. So far, I have identified three issues that
> prevent 3.4 from working. Fedora includes sos-3, sos doesn't have
> support for all ovirt plugins, and only has Wildfly instead of
> JBoss-as. The full list of bugs is listed in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198.
>
> 2) I was looking through the various oVirt yum repositories and
> noticed that oVirt provides JBoss-AS along with tons of packages for
> the el6 platform; however, for both Fedora 19 and 20, oVirt almost
> entirely uses built-in packages. This seems like strange behavior
> where the project has gone to great lengths to make sure oVirt works
> on platforms with outdated or nonexistent packages, but won't override
> or use alternates on platforms that contain overly new packages. Could
> someone explain why oVirt doesn't package these for Fedora,
> particularly jboss-as?
>
IMO fedora is more like a environment for development purpose, and I guess
oVirt didn't catch up with fedora's changes ? (I mean oVirt don't have
support for wildfly)

>
> 3) I'm not making accusations or trying to cause trouble, but could
> someone explain to an outsider what happened with Fedora 20 support?
> oVirt is a complicated project to say the least and, after a brief
> look at some of the RPMs last night, the packages are just as complex.
> Basically, I'm trying to figure out if there were some intractable
> problems that prevented oVirt from -- more or less -- shipping tweaked
> Fedora 19 dependencies for oVirt on Fedors 20, or whether it was more
> a lack of manpower, a lack of interested user base, or perhaps
>
> I'm just getting started on digesting the packages, but I think it
> should be feasible to pull the problematic packages from F19, tweak
> them to ovirt-* versions (eg. ovirt-sos), and tweak the oVirt packages
> to use the non-system paths for those packages. Publish the whole
> thing through COPR, and if oVirt is happy with the results, merge them
> into the official packages and repository.
>
> I know that there will be some apprehension about the project taking
> on maintaining these dependency packages, but I'm looking to get 3.4
> working on Fedora 20 as a stopgap until 3.5 is released with support
> for native packages.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140603/b2da51a0/attachment.html>