[ovirt-users] Can HA Agent control NFS Mount?

[Itamar Heim]

On 05/27/2014 03:47 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sven Kieske" <S.Kieske at mittwald.de>
>> To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
>> Cc: users at ovirt.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:44:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Can HA Agent control NFS Mount?
>>
>> So now I have to ask, what is the purpose of ovirt-all-in-one?
>>
>> Just for tech demos at events?
>>
>> I can live with any solution, but I feel it will limit ovirts adoption
>> and the use-cases should get better documented.
>>
>> There are still many beginners asking very basic questions on this ML
>> and I think this shows the lack of a better documentation for the first
>> steps to take for a working ovirt environment.
>>
>> Or what do you think?
>>
>> Am 27.05.2014 11:02, schrieb Doron Fediuck:
>>> I do not think a single-host use case is technically impossible, but we
>>> need
>>> to understand a VM may die, and in a single host setup this may have
>>> additional
>>> implications. So why get into troubles instead of planning your way or
>>> using
>>> the right tool for the task. Just imagine using a 5.4 Kg hammer to hang a
>>> picture
>>> frame on the wall.
>>
>> --
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
>>
>> Sven Kieske
>>
>> Systemadministrator
>> Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
>> Königsberger Straße 6
>> 32339 Espelkamp
>> T: +49-5772-293-100
>> F: +49-5772-293-333
>> https://www.mittwald.de
>> Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
>> St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
>> Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
>
> Hi Sven,
> All-in-one is classic-style installation (ie- not running in a vm), and indeed
> was created for demo's. However it indeed may grow to support additional hosts
> in a different DC, as the one it starts with is for local storage. This is why
> I was saying that the issue is not technical but requires some understanding
> of the admin to where he wants to go.
>
> As for documentation, that's always an issue. Keeping docs updated is an on going
> task and we'd appreciate any assistance we get for it.

Sven - so assuming we want to reduce the number of configurations we 
want to support, instead of all-in-one which was our previous solutions 
for POCs/Demos, what would look different for hosted-engine on a single 
host? just not have the "ha" feature?