[ovirt-users] SLA : RAM scheduling

Joop jvdwege at xs4all.nl
Fri Jun 13 10:50:38 UTC 2014


Michal Skrivanek wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2014, at 11:04, Sven Kieske wrote:
>
>   
>> Well, I know this is not that
>> helpful but afaik there is work done
>> to replace xml-rpc communication with json based
>> communication.
>>     
>
> @Sven:
> yeah, and one of the (many) reasons why we want it. But that's vdsm. 
> Scheduler is a different package/app.
> Typical workaround is to use a string type to pass integer numbers (or use smaller numbers:)
>
>   
>> Am 13.06.2014 10:57, schrieb Joop:
>>     
>>> Then oVirt shouldn't either use that kind of numbers or should not use
>>> xmlrpc.
>>>
>>> Sorry but thats a non-answer and doesn't help anybody.
>>>       
>
> @Joop:
> what's with the attitude?
> I have nothing to do with the scheduler and I have no idea what is it trying or supposed to return…I'm just pointing out the error is due to the large whatever number being returned; in hope of someone with knowledge of the scheduler will take it from there.
> I'd tend to agree XMLRPC is not the best thing to use; and I think it's important to keep reminding the common pitfalls of it.
>
>   
Sorry I'm only trying to help someone which got the code and it doesn't 
seem to work and I just figured out what is not working and replied that 
back to the list for everyone to see and comment on. With the now 
supplied reason I understand why it doesn't work but don't understand 
why the code is supplied in this form. Looking at the output again I 
don't get why the numbers are that big. The servers only have 32G and 
now way you use calc will it come close to the numbers seen :-(

Joop


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140613/44aff22e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Users mailing list