[ovirt-users] Spam Re: Spam Affinity

[Doron Fediuck]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maurice James" <mjames at media-node.com>
> To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
> Cc: "users" <users at ovirt.org>, "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik at redhat.com>, "Martin Sivak" <msivak at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 9:21:35 PM
> Subject: Spam Re: [ovirt-users] Spam  Affinity
> 
> Done
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112369
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck at redhat.com>
> To: "Maurice James" <mjames at media-node.com>
> Cc: "users" <users at ovirt.org>, "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik at redhat.com>, "Martin
> Sivak" <msivak at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 4:45:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Spam  Affinity
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Maurice James" <mjames at media-node.com>
> > To: "users" <users at ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 4:41:27 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] Spam  Affinity
> > 
> > If I set negative affinity on two VM that are currently on the same server,
> > how long until one of them migrates to a different host? Is the time
> > configurable somewhere? I think that as soon as I configure the negative
> > affinity between the two VMs, they should begin to migrate
> > 
> 
> Hi Maurice,
> affinity is being handled during the scheduling process and not
> afterwards. So already placed VMs will not move unless they will
> be picked up by the load balancing process which obeys affinity rules.
> 
> The reason for it is to avoid adding noise on loaded setups.
> However we should be able to make sure load balancing will handle
> affinity as well and only then balance the cluster.
> 
> Do mind opening an RFE for it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Doron
> 

Thanks Maurice.