[Users] Data Center Non Responsive / Contending

[Giorgio Bersano]

2014-03-04 15:23 GMT+01:00 Meital Bourvine <mbourvin at redhat.com>:
> Master data domain must be reachable in order for the DC to be up.
> Export domain shouldn't affect the dc status.
> Are you sure that you've created the export domain as an export domain, and not as a regular nfs?
>

Yes, I am.

Don't know how to extract this info from DB, but in webadmin, in the
storage list, I have these info:

Domain Name: nfs02EXPORT
Domain Type: Export
Storage Type: NFS
Format: V1
Cross Data-Center Status: Inactive
Total Space: [N/A]
Free Space: [N/A]

ATM my only "Data" Domain is based on iSCSI, no NFS.





> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Giorgio Bersano" <giorgio.bersano at gmail.com>
>> To: "Meital Bourvine" <mbourvin at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "users at ovirt.org" <Users at ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 4:16:19 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] Data Center Non Responsive / Contending
>>
>> 2014-03-04 14:48 GMT+01:00 Meital Bourvine <mbourvin at redhat.com>:
>> > StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist:
>> > (u'1810e5eb-9eb6-4797-ac50-8023a939f312',)
>> >
>> > What's the output of:
>> > lvs
>> > vdsClient -s 0 getStorageDomainsList
>> >
>> > If it exists in the list, please run:
>> > vdsClient -s 0 getStorageDomainInfo 1810e5eb-9eb6-4797-ac50-8023a939f312
>> >
>>
>> I'm attaching a compressed archive to avoid mangling by googlemail client.
>>
>> Indeed the NFS storage with that id is not in the list of available
>> storage as it is brought up by a VM that has to be run in this very
>> same cluster. Obviously it isn't running at the moment.
>>
>> You find this in the DB:
>>
>> COPY storage_domain_static (id, storage, storage_name,
>> storage_domain_type, storage_type, storage_domain_format_type,
>> _create_date, _update_date, recoverable, last_time_used_as_master,
>> storage_description, storage_comment) FROM stdin;
>> ...
>> 1810e5eb-9eb6-4797-ac50-8023a939f312
>> 11d4972d-f227-49ed-b997-f33cf4b2aa26    nfs02EXPORT     3       1
>>  0       2014-02-28 18:11:23.17092+01    \N      t       0       \N
>>   \N
>> ...
>>
>> Also, disks for that VM are carved from the Master Data Domain that is
>> not available ATM.
>>
>> To say in other words: I thought that availability of an export domain
>> wasn't critical to switch on a Data Center. Am I wrong?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Giorgio.
>>