[Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?

[David Smith]

Crap, didn't realize I just had to restart vdsm for the new API.py to take
effect.
Anyway I edited fencing.py and added back the compatibility code, and its
all working for now.

I'm going to work on touch up changes on fence_raritan so that we can get
it submitted into the next release hopefully, all of these other hacks will
become moot at that time.


On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:37:13AM -0700, David Smith wrote:
> > I created fence_raritan.
> >
> > Unfortunately it looks like fencing.py is where the legacy --option was
> > translated to --action. I believe ovirt calls fencing.py as a proxy to
> > execute fence_raritan?
> >
> > The version of fence-agents I pulled from git has the backwards
> > compatibility removed;
> >
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cluster-commits/2013-February/003090.html
> >
> >
> > So if I added support for it in fence_raritan I'm not sure it would work
> (I
> > can try) but also the fence-agents guys probably wouldn't take the
> > submission to have it added to future code.
>
> Indeed - I do not expect upstream fence-agents to accept the legacy
> option. However, you could backport your own code to el6, and create a
> "fence-agents-raritan" rpm from it.
>
> >
> > I edited API.py as in http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/26075/ and re-compiled
> > API.py to pyc and pyo files and copied to all my hosts, yet I'm still
> > getting an error, so I'm wondering if that change is incomplete or I
> missed
> > some other step to make this actually work.  It's really a bummer
> > especially since the default behavior with no action is reboot ;)
>
> I suppose that you have missed something. My don't you place API.py
> under /usr/share/vdsm ? And make sure you restart vdsmd, to make the new
> code take effect?
>
> >
> >
> > *Thread-199071::DEBUG::2014-03-25
> 10:28:10,587::API::1110::vds::(fenceNode)
> >
> fenceNode(addr=10.105.128.25,port=,agent=raritan,user=admin,passwd=XXXX,action=status,secure=,options=port=/system1/outlet6)*
> >
> >
> > *Thread-199071::DEBUG::2014-03-25
> 10:28:13,104::API::1136::vds::(fenceNode)
> > rc 0 in agent=fence_raritan*
> > *ipaddr=10.105.128.25*
> > *login=admin*
> > *option=status*
> > *passwd=XXXX*
> > *port=/system1/outlet6 out Success: Rebooted*
> > * err Parse error: Ignoring unknown option 'option=status'*
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:46:58AM -0400, Eli Mesika wrote:
> > > > AFAIK this is related to http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/24343/ which
> > > changed --option to --action
> > > > danken ?
> > >
> > > I smells very much related.
> > > Where is fence_raritan comming from? Could you have the el6 version of
> > > it support the legacy --option name?
> > >
> > > If not, we could consider taking http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/26075/.
> > >
> > > Dan.
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140325/d6e09e72/attachment-0001.html>