[Users] ovirt-engine-dwh missing dom4j dependency

Alon Bar-Lev alonbl at redhat.com
Fri Mar 28 11:38:59 UTC 2014



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> Cc: "users" <users at ovirt.org>, "Jorick Astrego" <j.astrego at netbulae.eu>, "Kiril Nesenko" <knesenko at redhat.com>,
> "David Caro" <dcaroest at redhat.com>, "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 2:35:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt-engine-dwh missing dom4j dependency
> 
> Il 28/03/2014 11:48, Alon Bar-Lev ha scritto:
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alonbl at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Jorick Astrego" <j.astrego at netbulae.eu>
> >> Cc: "users" <users at ovirt.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1:36:43 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt-engine-dwh missing dom4j dependency
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jorick Astrego" <j.astrego at netbulae.eu>
> >>> To: "users" <users at ovirt.org>
> >>> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1:34:21 PM
> >>> Subject: [Users] ovirt-engine-dwh missing dom4j dependency
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I cannot install ovirt-engine-dwh (3.4) on Centos 6.5 because missing
> >>> dom4j:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---> Package ovirt-engine-dwh.noarch 0:3.4.0-2.el6 will be installed
> >>> --> Processing Dependency: dom4j for package:
> >>> ovirt-engine-dwh-3.4.0-2.el6.noarch
> >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >>> Error: Package: ovirt-engine-dwh-3.4.0-2.el6.noarch (ovirt-3.4-stable)
> >>> Requires: dom4j
> >>> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >>> You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> >>
> >> Please add jpackage repo[1]
> > 
> > Sandro, maybe for el we need to add this via the ovirt-release?
> 
> I think we should decide once for all what to do with packages not included
> in official distribution repositories.
> 
> Currently we have various packages requiring external repos:
> 
> - glusterfs-latest (shipped within ovirt-release, enabled)
> - epel (not shipped but there's a repo file that allow to just yum install
> epel-release for easyng the epel repo setup)
> - fedora-virt-preview (shipped within ovirt-release, disabled)
> - jpackage (not shipped)
> 
> I think we should ship a single ovirt-dependencies.repo
> 
> with all of the above repo enabled but restricting install to the -release
> rpm for that repo and specific packages required by our packages, nothing
> more.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Agreed, 3rd party repo should be stable as much as we can.
However, since jpackage repo stable is not usable (it has inconsistencies with its own dependencies) we should use v6.

> 
> 
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.jpackage.org/browser/browse.php?jppversion=6.0
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>>
> >>> Jorick Astrego
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users at ovirt.org
> >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users at ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> 
> 
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
> 



More information about the Users mailing list