[ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION NEEDED] oVirt 3.4.2 RC status

Dan Kenigsberg danken at redhat.com
Wed May 21 08:08:10 EDT 2014


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:33:13AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 21/05/2014 11:08, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > and thanks for the list with the open bugs.
> > 
> > Here are my proposed blockers (I won't add
> > them directly without dev agreement)
> > The list is not ordered in any way:
> > 
> > Cache records in memory
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870330
> > Status: Post
> > 
> > ovirt-log-collector: conflicts with file from package sos >= 3.0
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037663
> > Status: Post
> 
> I'm working with sos maintainer for coordinating oVirt 3.4.2 release with sos 3.1.1 release fixing the issue
> by moving all oVirt sos plugins to upstream sos fixing conflicts once for all.
> Since a workaround exists (yum downgrade sos to 2.2-31.fc19 still available in F19) I don't think it should be a blocker.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Firmware missing
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063001
> > Status: Post
> > 
> > Hot plug CPU - allow over-commit
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097195
> > Status: New
> > 
> > Stucked tuned service during host deploying
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069119
> > Status: New
> > 
> > Failed to reconfigure libvirt for VDSM
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078309
> > Status: NEW
> 
> Let's discuss this on sync meeting, not sure it's important enough for blocking the release.
> 
> > 
> > [vdsm] Fix make distcheck target
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098179
> > Status: NEW

and this most certainly should not block a micro release. it is a
code-only change, with no functional effects.

> > 
> > Run vm with odd number of cores drop libvirt error
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070890
> > Status: New


More information about the Users mailing list